Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:26:41 PM No.17770572
>muh female rulers are better at war myth
Survivorship bias. Every single known female ruler had to do two things:
>declare her interest in ruling directly and be taken seriously, which requires certain attributes
>survive a succession crisis
Also female rulers have the natural advantage to attract lots of ambitious, competent men, who are willing to prove themselves. In fact the natural marriage candidat of a female ruler is a competent general.
So I think its retarded as fuck to conclude that female rulers are somehow inherently more competent at war or framed in a negative, moralistic way: warmongers. Or that female rulers are more competent based on their gender. People, who think that, probably hate any kind of natural selection process.
Survivorship bias. Every single known female ruler had to do two things:
>declare her interest in ruling directly and be taken seriously, which requires certain attributes
>survive a succession crisis
Also female rulers have the natural advantage to attract lots of ambitious, competent men, who are willing to prove themselves. In fact the natural marriage candidat of a female ruler is a competent general.
So I think its retarded as fuck to conclude that female rulers are somehow inherently more competent at war or framed in a negative, moralistic way: warmongers. Or that female rulers are more competent based on their gender. People, who think that, probably hate any kind of natural selection process.
Replies:
