How will [historians] remember the incel era of [humanity]?

No one will care, at most it'll only be mentioned in the odd footnote or offhand comment of obscure academic journals

>>17772228 (OP)
same way as here: watch them bump each other off the archives and boards cause "mah fantasy is better than mah brothers"

>>17772228 (OP)
They'll mention you specifically OP

>>17772228 (OP)
Probably not the way Netflix intends it to be remembered

>>17772228 (OP)
No one’s reading your [autobiography] OP

>>17772266
I disagree. It will probably have large sociopolitical consequences like feminism, Marxism etc

>>17772266
Young disillusioned men have never done anything before (Romulus' Rome vs Sabines, Iceland's Outlaws, Weimar Germany's chimpers)

Historians will observe that the 21st century societies became tyranicaly matriarchies leading to civilization collapse

>>17772228 (OP)
If we don't survive the Great Replacement, historiography as we know it will end because Whites are the only race that cares about "objective truth".

For other races, history is just a mixture of folklore and whatever the Big Guy currently in charge says happened a while ago

>You know who is stabbing people in the UK?
>Why apple cheeked little English boys of course!
Never change Netflix.

>>17772485
>>17772715
No chance. It isn't a movement. It isn't some sort of organised political bloc.

"Incel" is just a word used to describe weird virgin losers on the internet. Most people who the term actually applies to are so timid and socially hapless that they would be too awkward to ask you to move your bag on the bus so they could sit down.

There'll be a new word for incel some day, or no word at all. But there's always been entitled, boring faggots that blames his own social ineptitude on others. People love to LARP about some great uprising or breaking point as if the people we're talking about aren't so servile and retarded that they won't continually watch their quality of life sink and sink and sink until they die. And nobody will care

>>17773477
>But there's always been entitled, boring faggots that blames his own social ineptitude on others

Right, because boys are supposed to raise themselves and it's nobody else's fault if they turn out wrong, right?

Makes me wonder why it's even compulsory to go to school if the teachers cannot possibly be blamed for what you are like both before and after getting out of it

>>17773485
>because boys are supposed to raise themselves
what? do you need your mum to wipe your bum still? unless you're homeschooled I have no idea what you're on about
>the teachers cannot possibly be blamed for what you are like
but most social conditioning in school comes from your peers, not your teachers.

the vast majority of people are not "incels", they are normal. they don't sit on the internet screaming and crying. people uglier and less charismatic than you have loving relationships

99% of this "incel" faggotry is just porn addicts seething. you aren't a movement, you aren't some poor reject of society, give your head a wobble you weirdo

>How will [historians] remember the incel era of [humanity]?

>>17773499
>what? do you need your mum to wipe your bum still? unless you're homeschooled I have no idea what you're on about
This is such a non-sequitur that I won't touch it

>but most social conditioning in school comes from your peers, not your teachers.
So you admit teachers as they currently exist in most schools are kind of useless if not outright toxic, we're getting somewhere WRT how messy society is

>the vast majority of people are not "incels", they are normal
Tell me more of how most of the world population is normal when we have billions of people who want to move from dysfunctional countries to functional ones, and even the functional ones are full of poverty and social unease.
Maybe you know little about this because you were raised in privileged conditions, but that means you aren't allowed to speak on behalf of people who picked the shorter straw

>they don't sit on the internet screaming and crying
Check social media once in a while?

>loving relationships
Divorce rates are constantly increasing and sexual promiscuity is higher than ever. Stats don't lie about general trends
>inb4 but what about this rare exception!

>you aren't some poor reject of society
Why?
Because only the marginalised people you like get the precious title of "poor rejects", whereas others don't?
You are afraid you'll run out of golden coffins if too many people are acknowledged as having it hard?

You must be a leftist, which explains a few things indeed

>>17773526
>This is such a non-sequitur that I won't touch it
my bad anon, I genuinely just didn't know what you referred to. most boys don't raise themselves.
>teachers as they currently exist in most schools are kind of useless if not outright toxic
not really noticeably any more or less than before. the main change to teaching is overhead paperwork demoralising teachers. red tape and stuff like that.
>Maybe you know little about this because you were raised in privileged conditions
I grew up on a shitty council estate kek, but I understand what you're saying. Doesn't really explain why some random retard blames his failures on others.
>Check social media once in a while?
yeah, but people doing that are then logging off and having normal lives.
>Divorce rates are constantly increasing and sexual promiscuity is higher than ever
because before it was harder to get divorced, and women who wanted to were more financially dependent on their partners. this isn't the case anymore, so if a relationship fails it can actually end.
>Why? Why am I not a sociatal reject?
because for incels, their problem is they can't get laid. that's what we're talking about. people with poor social skills who sit online and seethe about it. with the dozens of dating apps and massive casualisation of sex, the only people not having sex are the insanely disabled or the people who don't want to.

like I said; ugly, smelly, weird cunts get into loving relationships. you can probably think of some. uglier and worse people than you are capable of having sex from time to time. if you aren't, it's probably because you are a fucking weirdo
>BUT THAT'S SOCIETY'S FAULT
maybe in your teenage years when your brain hasn't fully formed, but when you're in your 20s still talking about this shit you have to take responsibility. you sound like those poofters who got nonced at a young age and blame every failure they have on it well into their 30s.

>>17772228 (OP)
every era was the incel era, most men born never procreated

>>17773275
>he's never read a Chinese historical debate