These are your ancestors
Say something nice about them

>>17773687 (OP)

Monke :)

>>17773687 (OP)
Would

>>17773687 (OP)
hello ancestors :D

>>17773687 (OP)
I feel like gorillas would've done a better job at using knowledge and abstract thought.

>>17773687 (OP)
hello pop pop
i have so much food! and it never runs out!
its all thanks to you, now i live better than a CHIEF
love you

>>17773701
which one? or both?

>>17773687 (OP)
They seem based.

>>17773687 (OP)
Nice cock, pops.

>>17773687 (OP)
Umm, sir. This is a blue board.

>>17773687 (OP)
return to monke

>>17773780
How so?

>>17774448
I dunno. I feel like even in captivity, they do pretty well compared to other great apes. So if they gained our level of intelligence, they would be maybe 15% less aggressive than humans.

Or maybe orangutans would be better. Not the chimpanzees and not the bonobos though.

>>17773687 (OP)
I'm unironically that hairy.
It just doesn't grow as long; the coverage is about the same, though.

>>17773687 (OP)
Speak for yourself, My ancestor is Adam, created in God's image.

>>17773687 (OP)
>brown hair
>intermediate skin color
Eurasid monkeys.... we won

>>17773780
>>17774448
>>17774486

If I remember correctly: Paranthropus was the "gorillas attempt at a hominid".
They were around during Homo Erectus' time and for whatever reason they didn't make it through to the end. They were physically quite robust, nearly twice as large as other hominids in Africa, used simple bone and stone tools, could cook, so it wasn't a lack of technology or physical frailness. Wikipedia says they may have kept the gorillas social tendency towards harems and that may have prevented them from effectively defending themselves from ape-men with larger more mix-gendered congregations. They were also herbivorous, as far as we can tell, which I'd consider a development handicap.

>>17773687 (OP)
Is that supposed to be Adam and eve

>>17773687 (OP)
My ancestors were not italian!

>>17775201
You remember incorrectly. They had nothing to do with Gorillas. They were another branch off of Australopithecus just like the Homo's. In fact some scientist do not even consider them a separate clade from the Australopithecus. There is also no conclusive evidence they used tools besides scavenged bones in a similar manner to chimpanzee's and zero evidence that they could cook. They were also not larger than the Homo's running around at the same, in fact often shorter instead being thicker and stockier hence why some paleontologists call them "Robust Australopithecines"

>>17773687 (OP)
Sorry, you posted two Brazilian citizens, please try again.