Why do chuds bitch about the Northern Crusades when it was literally the same exact freaking thing as modern settler colonialism? The only difference was that the Balts were white otherwise it was the same thing as what Westerners did during the Age of Discovery and beyond. Either you think the Northern Crusades are good because Colonialism/Progress/Civilization/blahblahblah is good or you think they were bad because invading people is generally bad.

You made the same thread yesterday

>>17774756
It's an important point.

>>17774751 (OP)
Settler colonialism is le bad too

>>17774768
>passive-aggressively seething about a strawman
>"important point"

>>17774780
The Northern Crusades were the exact same thing as settler colonialism except chuds gloat about it when it was done to browns and then keep crying and bitching when it was done to white Eastern Europeans.

>>17774751 (OP)
Settler colonialism is just academic newspeak for "i got conquered and couldn't fight back"

>>17774787
Have you got five examples of posts on this board in separate threads of a chud with inconsistent thoughts on settler colonialism and the northern crusades or is this just a vent thread about 'the chuds'?

I know what the answer is, I just want you to confirm it

>>17774751 (OP)
>you think they were bad because invading people is generally bad
Yes. Your point?

>>17774751 (OP)
cuz nazis and germanee

>>17774751 (OP)
>The only difference was that the Balts were white
That makes all the difference. Eastern europeans are the most racist whites, being treated in a racist manner themselves, by white people that are in fact (they cannot deny that) more accomplished on top, causes them enduring butthurt.

>>17774944
Most of these people bitching about it are (presumably) Americans and Western Europeans doebeit