Anonymous
6/19/2025, 1:53:36 PM No.17775870
A Catholic bishop told me that there are theological issues with the King James Version of the Bible.
What are they?
What are they?
Replies:
Thread 17775870 - /his/ [Archived: 982 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 2:03:10 PM No.17775885
>>17775870 (OP)
Its a protestant Bible so its removes deuterocanonical books from the Old Testament.
The KJV also based its translations off the Greek Septuagint, Masoretic Texts, and the Textus Receptus from 1516.
Whereas the Catholic Bible has remained the same since the Latin Vulgate, prepared by St Jerome in the 4th century.
Its a protestant Bible so its removes deuterocanonical books from the Old Testament.
The KJV also based its translations off the Greek Septuagint, Masoretic Texts, and the Textus Receptus from 1516.
Whereas the Catholic Bible has remained the same since the Latin Vulgate, prepared by St Jerome in the 4th century.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 2:04:23 PM No.17775888
>>17775885
The KJV contained a translation of the apocrypha until the 19th century.
The KJV contained a translation of the apocrypha until the 19th century.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 4:30:00 PM No.17776146
>>17775870 (OP)
Its got a unicorn in it. Oh, and william shakespear hid his name somewhere in the psalms.
Its got a unicorn in it. Oh, and william shakespear hid his name somewhere in the psalms.
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 4:41:16 PM No.17776167
>>17775870 (OP)
Not enough pedastry for his tastes
Not enough pedastry for his tastes
Anonymous
!JEWS.kY0hk
6/19/2025, 5:37:32 PM No.17776264
It 'conteyns' interpolations by later authors, such as the entire New Testament.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 7:13:12 PM No.17776447
>>17775885
>Lies about knowing Hebrew to get a job translating the Bible
>Cuts ties with his best friend and calls him Satanic the moment he says something he doesn’t like
>Convinces a woman to starve herself to death
>complains to the mother that she is making him look bad because she’s crying about her dead daughter
>Says he could have also been Pope if she didn’t do it
>Runs away from Rome because everybody hates him
>Begs wealthy aristocrats for money despite it being illegal and being wealthy himself
>Has nightmares about reading Cicero
>Write a fictional Saints life to make his personal favourite sound cooler than Saint Antony
Why was this Jerome a Saint again?
>Lies about knowing Hebrew to get a job translating the Bible
>Cuts ties with his best friend and calls him Satanic the moment he says something he doesn’t like
>Convinces a woman to starve herself to death
>complains to the mother that she is making him look bad because she’s crying about her dead daughter
>Says he could have also been Pope if she didn’t do it
>Runs away from Rome because everybody hates him
>Begs wealthy aristocrats for money despite it being illegal and being wealthy himself
>Has nightmares about reading Cicero
>Write a fictional Saints life to make his personal favourite sound cooler than Saint Antony
Why was this Jerome a Saint again?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 7:22:14 PM No.17776461
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 7:27:56 PM No.17776470
>>17775870 (OP)
Someone needs to watch a Peter Ruckman lecture I tell you hwat.
Someone needs to watch a Peter Ruckman lecture I tell you hwat.
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 7:29:27 PM No.17776473
>>17775885
Have fun burning!
Have fun burning!
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:25:34 AM No.17777153
>>17776264
Go on.
Go on.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:35:31 AM No.17777167
Replies:
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:45:06 AM No.17777180
Well its pretty clear why the KJV cult is obsessed with hell. Go ahead and search other translations or the NABRE.
KJV, Revelations 20:13-14
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death."
KJV, Revelations 20:13-14
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death."
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 4:47:30 AM No.17777682
>>17777167
So does the Douay-Rheims. What’s your point?
So does the Douay-Rheims. What’s your point?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 4:49:01 AM No.17777686
>>17775885
>The KJV also based its translations off the Greek Septuagint, Masoretic Texts, and the Textus Receptus from 1516.
It is not based on any of these.
It is actually based on the Daniel Bomberg text of 1525 for the Old Testament, which differs from the Ben Asher Masoretic text in a number of places.
In the New Testament, it is based primarily on the 1550 Textus Receptus of Stephanus and the 1598 Textus Receptus of Beza, which were more accurate and used many more manuscripts.
>Whereas the Catholic Bible has remained the same since the Latin Vulgate, prepared by St Jerome in the 4th century.
Not true either. The Clementine and Sixtine recensions of the Vulgate were far different from ancient handwritten copies, such as Codex Amiatinus, and that manuscript isn't even exactly what Jerome used either. Modern renditions of the vulgate used Jerome's translation of the Hebrew, except for the Psalms where modern renditions use his translation of the Greek for some reason even though he also made a translation of the Hebrew Psalms.
See https://www.bible-researcher.com/vulgate1.html
You really seem not to know what you're talking about.
>The KJV also based its translations off the Greek Septuagint, Masoretic Texts, and the Textus Receptus from 1516.
It is not based on any of these.
It is actually based on the Daniel Bomberg text of 1525 for the Old Testament, which differs from the Ben Asher Masoretic text in a number of places.
In the New Testament, it is based primarily on the 1550 Textus Receptus of Stephanus and the 1598 Textus Receptus of Beza, which were more accurate and used many more manuscripts.
>Whereas the Catholic Bible has remained the same since the Latin Vulgate, prepared by St Jerome in the 4th century.
Not true either. The Clementine and Sixtine recensions of the Vulgate were far different from ancient handwritten copies, such as Codex Amiatinus, and that manuscript isn't even exactly what Jerome used either. Modern renditions of the vulgate used Jerome's translation of the Hebrew, except for the Psalms where modern renditions use his translation of the Greek for some reason even though he also made a translation of the Hebrew Psalms.
See https://www.bible-researcher.com/vulgate1.html
You really seem not to know what you're talking about.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 5:56:00 AM No.17777803
>>17777786
The Bomberg text is more accurate than the Ben Asher Masoretic text in a number of places in the Old Testament. For example, in Malachi 1:12, the Bomberg text (used by the KJV) has the Tetragrammaton, which is translated LORD in English. The Masoretic text (used by modern versions) from something like Biblia Hebraica and based on Codex Leningradensis, instead has "Adonai" in this verse, which would be translated "Lord."
Another example is Zephaniah 3:15. The KJV's source text is accurate in that it says, "thou shalt not see evil any more." In this verse, modern translations based on the actual Masoretic replace the word "see evil" with "fear evil." That is a completely different meaning and based on different words in Hebrew.
For the New Testament, it is simply true that the KJV is based on better sources of the Received Text. They used Stephanus' text of 1550 and Beza's text of 1598 in almost every place, and other Greek received text editions in a handful of places. They never used the Textus Receptus of 1516, they would never need to.
The Bomberg text is more accurate than the Ben Asher Masoretic text in a number of places in the Old Testament. For example, in Malachi 1:12, the Bomberg text (used by the KJV) has the Tetragrammaton, which is translated LORD in English. The Masoretic text (used by modern versions) from something like Biblia Hebraica and based on Codex Leningradensis, instead has "Adonai" in this verse, which would be translated "Lord."
Another example is Zephaniah 3:15. The KJV's source text is accurate in that it says, "thou shalt not see evil any more." In this verse, modern translations based on the actual Masoretic replace the word "see evil" with "fear evil." That is a completely different meaning and based on different words in Hebrew.
For the New Testament, it is simply true that the KJV is based on better sources of the Received Text. They used Stephanus' text of 1550 and Beza's text of 1598 in almost every place, and other Greek received text editions in a handful of places. They never used the Textus Receptus of 1516, they would never need to.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 6:01:31 AM No.17777811
>>17775888
Even so they were grouped separately from the Old Testament, which Catholics would object to.
Even so they were grouped separately from the Old Testament, which Catholics would object to.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 6:21:47 AM No.17777844
>>17777682
The DRA is the only Bible translation that inserts Marian dogma into Genesis 3:15.
The DRA is the only Bible translation that inserts Marian dogma into Genesis 3:15.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 9:42:02 AM No.17778153
>>17777844
Roma locuta, causa finita est.
Roma locuta, causa finita est.
