>testimony of "former atheist"
>is actually just a lifelong christian who had some doubts at one point or was angry at god

If christcucks were capable of honesty they wouldn't be christcucks.

>former atheist
>somehow can't rebuke the various arguments other atheists bring up

>>17775911
I don't care what exactly a believer's faith consists of, I don't wish to get into people's heads the way a shrink would.

What I care about is whether a believer can give me any actual evidence that their God is real and can influence reality in any way

>>17775929
Every single time they try to default back to "What would convince this guy of god being real?" instead of "How do we actually fucking prove this shit unequivocally?".
>Nature pretty therefore talking snake.
>Gay people scary therefore talking snake.
>Math hard therefore talking snake.

>>17775912
>bring up
what exactly did you actually put effort into "bringing up" limpwits? Point to a rock and say "hard"?

>>17775903 (OP)
>How <atheists> should concede defeat "like a gent 101"

>>17775929
>influence reality
Made you read the meme, didn't it.
>God is a mystery - hides His face, raises the veil etc. Thus it induces action from believers and nonbelievers alike throughout the whole world.

>>17775903 (OP)
My favorites are the incels that convert to Catholicism so that they can get laid.

>>17775907
/thread

>>17776526
that's not how you greentext

>>17775903 (OP)
>I was actually just rebelling against god and i believed god the whole time
>So therefore that's why every other atheist is an atheist

>>17776481
If God is necessary for a complex structure then how would you explain the complex structure that would be God?

>>17775903 (OP)