>”The Jews killed Jesus.”
Um, no? Actually the Romans killed Jesus. Why don’t you persecute the descendants of Rome aka Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Brits, French, Greeks, Turks, Germans, & Romanians, instead of Jews?

Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??


The New Testament accounts state that Roman soldiers were responsible for the literal act of nailing Jesus to the cross. While the chief priests and elders of the people plotted to kill Jesus, it was Roman soldiers who carried out the execution. The book of Acts also mentions that under God's sovereignty, "both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel" were responsible for Jesus' death.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Acts 4:27-28:
This passage states that both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, were responsible for Jesus' death.
Mark 15:24:
This passage explicitly describes the Roman soldiers as nailing Jesus to the cross.
Matthew 27:2-3:
This passage describes the chief priests and elders of the people delivering Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor.
Luke 23:39:
This passage mentions that the Roman soldiers were responsible for carrying out the crucifixion.

Why is spam allowed on /his/?

>>17776479 (OP)
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:

"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)