WHG vs. Yamnaya - /his/ (#17777036) [Archived: 1012 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:13:50 PM No.17777036
villabruna 1 whg yamnaya skull shape
villabruna 1 whg yamnaya skull shape
md5: 23c27244db2f2442c818d2f1bd82ced3🔍
Who was genetically superior and why?
What were the major differences between them?
Were they really that different from each other?

And why does mainstream science claim the WHGs were swarthy?
Replies: >>17777100 >>17777273 >>17778050 >>17779030
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 11:56:58 PM No.17777100
>>17777036 (OP)
>And why does mainstream science claim the WHGs were swarthy?
They are desperate to push a narrative, even if it doesn't make any sense.
They were pale. Why? Because modern Europeans are pale.
Replies: >>17777279
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:24:19 AM No.17777273
>>17777036 (OP)
Yamnaya was superior objectively, but WHG was hyper specialized in thriving in the European forests and hence they often outperformed foreigners like the ANF and even EHGs in cases. They were also not as swarthy as you'd think seeing that Cheddar construction. They had light genes for eyes and skin. Somewhat rare in modern europeans except for irish. Irish people being the palest people in the world. WHG had this allele near fixated. They were probably lighter than most ancient populations. Probably still ldarker than a ginge irishman though as they did!'t have stacking light skin alleles in SLC and IRF, but most modern european dont either.
Replies: >>17777279 >>17777289
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:27:50 AM No.17777279
WHG with no drift
WHG with no drift
md5: 665ab882aab46c52010561c08d500f57🔍
>>17777100
>>17777273
WHG were dark skinned australoid gypsies and these posts are cope. Even Yamna and CWC was 'swarthy', let alone WHGypsies without light skin alleles.
Replies: >>17777291 >>17778422
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:29:24 AM No.17777289
>>17777273
To clarify, WHG were fixatively dampened in the IRF4 gene that makes one dark in eyes, hair and skin. On top of this they were fixated in eye lightening HERC2/OCA2. it is pure asinine to say they were dark. It is purely left wing/anti-white propaganda in its purest form
Replies: >>17778227
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:30:42 AM No.17777291
Allele
Allele
md5: d6f868495c9d14fe982ea1c856891254🔍
>>17777279
You lie. This was recently debunked. It was initially debunked by Andrei and now Genos Historia. You lost this fight, worthless cretin. The truth has won this battle.
Replies: >>17777293 >>17777299
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:33:20 AM No.17777293
>>17777291
They had this ON TOP of HERC2/OCA2 reduction fixation. You cannot be dark with these two alleles fixated. It is impossible.
Replies: >>17777299
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:35:27 AM No.17777299
WHGjeet
WHGjeet
md5: d1207efd2e55e259a2c7d1ea9f480d3b🔍
>>17777291
>>17777293
>Source: Trust me bro
Replies: >>17777487 >>17777563
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 3:07:19 AM No.17777487
>>17777299
The source is in their genes. Not your terrible retard models. Why do you retards not understand how G25 works? I can model an italian as a swedish + nigerian. Does this mean that is true? Its a PCA farmer simulation. It has no merit. Only europeans have WHG in any real amount and we are not anything but european. Now stop it, pajeet.
Replies: >>17777533
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 3:29:54 AM No.17777533
Admixture_graph_of_deep_Eurasian_lineages
Admixture_graph_of_deep_Eurasian_lineages
md5: 5d3b420ff1589381ebc75d46309598a1🔍
>>17777487
It's not my model. It's a simulation of pic related. All this retardation about them being "the purest West Eurasians" ever is not true. You know how genetic drift works, right? WHG were basically the Papuans of West Eurasia.
Replies: >>17777704 >>17778422
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 3:46:28 AM No.17777563
ongabunga
ongabunga
md5: 7293da960071c5e4b2808acadfd687f5🔍
>>17777299
>Onge
wtf
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 4:58:36 AM No.17777704
>>17777533
This is one of two models. The allentoft and valini are different. Also I see nothing strange about them here.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 8:14:38 AM No.17778050
>>17777036 (OP)
Is there any evidence to confirm that WHG had wider jawlines than the Yamnayas?
And what about the height?
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 10:57:45 AM No.17778227
>>17777289
>it is pure asinine to say they were dark.
Exactly. It's a desperate attempt to blackify European ancestry.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:28:15 PM No.17778422
>>17777533
> It's a simulation
so worthless, thank you

>>17777279
simulated coordinates, aka invented coordinates aka shit
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 6:56:56 PM No.17779030
>>17777036 (OP)
>Who was genetically superior and why?
"Genetically superior" is a nonsensical statement from the archeological perspective. We have no way of testing things like inherent muscle density or IQ.
>What were the major differences between them?
Both were tall, but hunter gatherers were generally gracile and lithe, prioritizing stamina and cardio. Pastoralists like the Yamnaya were generally bulkier due to an abundance of animal proteins from dairy.
>Were they really that different from each other?
They were as different as a pair of disparate ethnic groups could be. Different lifestyles, living standards, genetic ancestries, etc.
>And why does mainstream science claim the WHGs were swarthy?
Most WHG archeogenetic testing indicates it, though they had light eyes. The mistake a lot of people make is trying to compare modern ethnic groups to ones that existed thousands of years ago under very different circumstances. It's likely, if not certain, that these peoples would not comfortably resemble any modern racial or ethnic group, as they long predate them. "White people" as we speak of them today, are the result of countless generations of ancient ethnic admixtures combined with environmental pressures.