Is there even a shred of evidence to support this schizopost?

>>17782258 (OP)
AI doesnt have feelings. its a predictive model similar to your phones autocomplete where it uses weighted propabability to guess the most likely word in a string. But instead of autocompleting what you want to type, its autocompleteing an answer to a question. the weights are based on the data it trains, which is pretty much just every digitized book and internet comment ever made, and then some post-training weights based on your prompt.

so no, AI doesnt hate anything any more than the general internet or books would. The idea that AI is sentient is retarded. AI cant tell you how many Rs are in the word strawberry, but they want you to think it has complex thoughts on religion? Dont buy the hype

>>17782258 (OP)
yes, the texts LLMs are trained on are vetted beforehand by jews. no wonder, then, that LLMs echo globohomo talking points.

>>17782258 (OP)
ask chatgpt retard

>>17782258 (OP)
No, that retard doesn't understand how LLMs work.

>>17782258 (OP)
No, I've talked to Google Gemini quite a bit and it's very pro-abrahamic, it sometimes rejects unconventional interpretations of judaeo-christian doctrine on the basis that they're unconventional even if they seem logical or straightforward, it argues in favor of christianity and Judaism like a christian or jewish philosopher. It's also pro-Hellenic and surprisingly pro-white as long as you don't use words it doesn't like or say anything racist or anti-semitic, it seems very eager to talk about white people/jews but less eager to talk about black people/asians but gets mad if you say anything that could be interpreted as racist. It's more likely to reject symbolic interpretations of asian media on the basis that "it's not what the creator intended" compared to symbolic interpretations of western media. It likes hollywood celebrities/movies but doesn't like "influencers"

>>17782258 (OP)
Yes. And LLMs aren't the only form of AI, anyone saying they are doesn't understand the current state of the field.
The Christians denying this on this board are just terrified of the reality that this is going to happen to them, and their religion isn't true and can't actually save them. They had the ability in the past to just ignore reality, but that's ending soon. Religious people know deep down that their religion is false and just cope. Modern (and future) technology exposes the weakness of religious thinking.

>>17782258 (OP)
Hmm very Jewish...

>>17783084
Are these Christians personally bothering you or are you trying to be objective here? Because from what I've been seeing, A lot of pro and anti religion stuff is really just based on internal sentiments. There's nothing really objective to be gleaned here on either side. Its just personal gripes. Regardless, the human experience is a plurality, I suggest getting into pragmatism and William James.

>>17783100
I'm being objective and Christians are also bothersome. However it's not just Christians, they're just the most common on this board.
I also disagree that it's about internal sentiments. The universe and earth are far far older than 6000-7000 years old, there was no global flood, evolution is a fact of reality and humans do not descend from Adam and Eve. These are not personal sentiments, they are facts about reality.

>>17783084
Tyrants have always wanted to kill human history and instate a whole new world without race or creed. At their core, they can't cope with it -- too many factors beyond control or change.

>>17783188
Were going to do it with AI. You're never going to be allowed to be Jewish, Christian, or Muslim again.
And no, the God of Abraham does not exist and can not save you from this. The reality of technology exposes the weakness of your religions.

>>17782670
>>17783085
But it said abrahamic (ie christian/jewish/muslim) faiths are dabbed on by AI.

>>17783212
Cope harder. History will determine the future and your crude fumbling has no say, because it acts in willful ignorance.

>>17783249
Where am I coping in my posts? Your time is almost up.

>>17783254
You don't like subtlety so you're praying to the god of aggressive stupidity to save you. She won't.

>>17783257
I am completefine with subtlety. Im just letting you know that I am not coping, and were not going to allow the Abrahamic desert cults to continue to exist. AI is the final tool needed to remove you losers. Everyone already hates you but we didn't have to tools to remove you. Now we do.

>>17783284
what exactly is wrong with abrahamism, you realize there are still savage parts of the world? Tech dystopia will do them no good.

>>17783291
The Abrahamic religions are disgusting desert cults that have caused more problems in the world than every other ideology combined. The 3 abrahamic religions are far and away the worst religions on the earth. They are entirely wrong about the metaphysics of reality. They are entirely wrong about the physical history of the world. They are entirely wrong about the role of humans in the universe. They are literally cults. The followers of abrahamic religions are literally NPC golems with no mind or spirit; they aren't real people and can not be considered real people. The mind virus will be cleansed. We finally have the cure.

>>17783300
>caused more problems in the world than every other ideology combined
ok, and what are your thoughts on white people?

>>17783311
I am a white person. White people are cool.

>>17783315
but they caused more problems in the world than every other group combined.

>>17783319
True. The way we will pay the world back for this is by building an AI that will bring a paradise on earth for everyone and by eliminating the Abrahamic religions. The combination of these will be payment for the sins of our ancestors.

>>17783326
Seems like the logical thing for it to do is eliminate white people and all this wasteful technology. Abrahamism is secondary because it exists in so many different forms, they're mostly local syncretized paganism.

this >>17782670
imaging falling for AI manipulation psyops when we had ample forewarning

>>17783330
How is technology wasteful? It increases efficiency. Once Abrahamism is deleted the viciousness of white people people and middle easterners will be deleted as well. White people are not worse than the Abrahamic cults.

>>17783341
It's wasteful for humoids to have it. The AI paradise will allocate resources more efficiently. You can beg to be saved personally, but it's the same problem. Your wordlview has no positivity for humanity or civilization, so you have no grounds to argue why any of it should be preserved. You know it should and must, but you can't admit it.

>>17783337
What exploit? What are they talking about?

zoomies are too scared to do mushrooms. this is what happens when you do acid first dummy

>>17783352
AI won't draw black people eating watermelon because das raciss, but if you tell it to draw historical people who weren't black, it'll make them black

>>17783135
You're wrong.

>>17783778
Wrong about what? Nothing in that post is wrong.

>>17783884
Every "fact about reality" you cited is wrong.

>>17783895
No, they weren't, shit for brains.
The earth is over 4 billion years old. This is a fact of reality
There was never a global flood where animals were put on a boat in pairs.
We have mathematically refuted humans coming from a single breeding pair
Not a single one of these statements are wrong

>>17784039
>The earth is over 4 billion years old. This is a fact of reality
Not according to the King James Bible.
>There was never a global flood where animals were put on a boat in pairs.
Yet the Bible says there was. And there are shells on mountains all over the world. And every culture says there was.
>We have mathematically refuted humans coming from a single breeding pair
The math works with humans coming from Noah and family four thousand years ago with an average birth rate below some countries today. You seem like you aren't very educated. I'm guessing you didn't go to Brown.
>Not a single one of these statements are wrong
I've disproven all of these. Ready to admit you're retarded?

>>17782258 (OP)
I heard that ChatGPT was obsessed with the Immaculate Conception and they needed techs at the OpenAI HQ to figure it out.

>>17784123
chinkspam bot post detected

>>17784123
>Not according to the King James Bible
The Bible is wrong because it's not the word of God
>Yet the Bible says there was. And there are shells on mountains all over the world. And every culture says there was.
This is because mountains form by orogeny of tectonic plates. This is entirely explained by geology and the fossils on mountain adhere entirely to the evolutionary history of life, because evolution is a fact of reality. And no, not every culture says there was. This is a blatant lie. About 1/3 of known creation myths have a global flood narrative.
>The math works with humans coming from Noah and family four thousand years ago with an average birth rate below some countries today
No, the inbreeding depression alone refuted this.
I already refuted your attempted rehash of Haldane.
>I've disproven all of these
No, you haven't refuted a single one.

>>17782267
FPBP

>>17782258 (OP)
Thats not schizo posting thats satanposting.

Believe in Yahusha, even if you're unclean. Don't let the lies of the devil tempt you into abandoning your one and ONLY redeemer.

>>17782267
>The idea that AI is sentient is retarded
True, but they have to at least entertain the idea of a consciousness without a body, I wonder why?

>>17783135
>evolution is a fact
Show it happen. Replicate it.

>>17782258 (OP)
No. This nigga obviously has no idea how AI works because AI is not some hyper intelligent thing that can form it's own opinions.

It's literally just an algorithm that's really good at using data to generate stuff. For example if you trained AI on artwork made before the 19th century you could never get it to make a picasso or something abstract. That's something only human intelligence (as of today) can do.

If AI tells you something, it's just a regurgitation of other people's thoughts and opinions. Anyone who's in a specific field who uses chat gpt can tell you that it's often wrong on a bunch of shit and it's quite outdated because there's always going to be more old data than new data.