How would history have changed, if the first vikings in America were more racist and thus aware of the lactose intolerance of non-Whites, which would have prevented them from making enemies with the Amerindians, since they wouldn't deem their raw cow milk as a suitable trade good, thus not giving the natives stomach cramps and not making them think they were poisoned by these naive Nords? Would Vinland have been possible with these hypothetical racist Scandinavians, who would have preserved the initially good relations between the races through their superior understanding of racism?

>>17783024 (OP)
allowing any of you to ever continue to live is always a mistake

>>17783024 (OP)
>more racist
The first "important" settler of iceland was a HAPA of half Sikhirtya walrushunter stock and half local of Rogaland. He moved to Iceland in protest against his parents that did not want war against the christian Harald Fairhair and instead were content with being his clients. The "Pagan" defender/founder of Iceland was a literal darkskinned HAPA that technically was the heir of the "Norway" that Harald Fairhair sacked. Geirmund "Burntskin" Hjørssons parents were the original rulers of Avaldsnes which is at the sound that the name "North Way" comes from.
Not only that, but the Icelanders had a more "worldly" makeup than the inland norwegians that sided with Fairhair, due to importing British Isles genetics and also having the darkerskinned/haired "Strandid" western norwegian phenotype among their ranks.
Iceland had the full range of northwestern european phenotypes, including sami/sikhirtya.

>>17783024 (OP)
holy shit, that lactose intolerance thing makes a lot of sense. I always wondered why they suddenly started attacking the settlers

>>17783564
racism saves lives

how did they bring cows there

>>17784409
On boats.

>>17783024 (OP)
there were other potential settlement sites and other groups of natives in the region, even if things didn't go bad with that group
I think the obstacles were just too formidable, fun as Vinland Saga is, it's not like vikings were generally known for their pacifism

>>17783024 (OP)
The vikings simply weren't driven to settle those lands for any ulterior motives beyond immediate need for space. Spaniards that arrived later were all profiteers and rapists who did it for a paycheck. Bong settlers were mentally ill fanatics who believed the jewish God gave them the inhospitable lands to the West.

>>17783030
An adventure towards jewish supremacy.

>>17783030
injuns would have been infinitely superior to tranglo-fagsons with a giantess fetish

>>17783024 (OP)
If Vinland miraculously survived and didn't get abandoned because Greenland got abandoned with the Little Ice Age - it would be a tiny impoverished remote shithole nominally under Danish control. It'd be like the medieval/early modern version of a lunar base.

>>17784576
And the bongs or even frogs would probably conquer it during the 1500s-1750s.