>>17787717 (OP)>I don't believe that Illyrians, Thracians, Sarmatians and Germans were truly red haired.I think the skepticism the account of Xenophanes has received is unwarranted, the one where he implied Thracians were red-haired and blue-eyed. I'll explain why. Try to be patient because the answer isn't Nordicism.
In a very literal sense, πυρρός means flame-colored. This is because the word for fire is πῦρ. So in other words, this interpretation of the language is straightforward. It involves no mental gymnastics even if the word could have alternative meanings.
https://logeion.uchicago.edu/%CF%80%CF%85%CF%81%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%82
Where are we going wrong then? By thinking these descriptions are anything more than an exaggerated stereotype. For comparison, the red hair frequency in Ireland is a whopping 10% of the population. Yet the Irish are frequently stereotyped as red-haired. Is it a Nordicist conspiracy? Of course not. This is just a natural human tendency to stereotype based on notable unique features.
With this in mind, I would assume not even 10% of Thracians being red-haired would be necessary for Xenophanes claims. Half (5%) or a quarter (2.5%) as many is probably all it would take for outside ethnic groups to stereotype Thracians in this regard. Red hair at a low frequency isn't impossible. Remember that it even appears in the Levant.