Historically, why did the Anglos get so much hate?
>>17787757 (OP)Success breeds jealousy and creates enemies. Everyone who seethes about Anglos is some sort of history autist obsessed with the time their country lost to Anglos.
>>17788052When they win it's the genius of the anglo-saxon, when they lose it the jews
They think they are great when they have been all along just the lapdogs of their Jewish overlords. They did not even were the elites on their own island. Just serfs of a Judeo-Norman elite.
>>17787757 (OP)Because they got almost entirely bought out during the Napoleonic wars and 18th century. The Jews fairly successfully infested almost all levels of British politics/finance/banking and didn't immediately discard their host nation, instead using their tremendous initiative to carve out important features of the new world. Usually when you see an Anglo behaving in an atrocious manner he is doing so at the behest of some mysterious benefactor.
>>17787757 (OP)Anglos have effectively destroyed all self-conscious whites. That includes the American South, then the Boers, then Germany, then Rhodesia, and South Africa.
When they witnessed our power, they felt envy.
When they witnessed our people, they felt greed.
When they experienced our fairness, they saw stupidity.
When they experienced our kindness, they saw weakness.
They want all the things we have, but they can't create or maintain it themselves, so they embrace an identity around "oppression" to justify taking all we have built ourselves. The world doesn't deserve the Anglo-saxon, who would no doubt be the master of the stars had the rest of the world not pulled at his feet.
Should modernity bring us to ruin, nothing half as great as the British Empire will be born in the next ten thousand years.