Roger Peyrefitte was a French diplomat, public figure, and writer, whose entire career as an author was based around defending and writing about pederasty — yet he never faced ostracism in mainstream French society. His actions were supported almost unanimously by the French intelligentsia, who petitioned the government to abolish laws protecting minors from sexual exploitation by adults.

He even had an open sexual relationship with a 12-year-old boy (in pic rel.), that he met in the 1960s at the film set for a movie based on a novel he wrote about two schoolboys having a gay relationship with each other, Les amitiés particulières. He eventually adopted this boy, and even wrote novels detailing his sexual relationship with the boy, which nobody saw any issue with.

To the surprise of nobody, he received his last rites from the Catholic Church shortly before dying in November 5, 2000, without ever being persecuted legally or socially for his open, documented pedophilic crimes.

Why was pedophilia so normalized in French society? Is it an hereditary affliction?

>>17789288 (OP)
I know about this case. The fact that they look happy in all photos together just tells you that the relationship wasn't abusive like feminists claim all adult-child sexual relationships to be. It was trve Aryan man/boy love, the most pure and noble form of love. The only degenerate aspect of this situation is the fact that it isn't more common. The fact that this would be a massive controversy if it happened in France today shows us that French society has regressed, as further evidenced by its demographic decline. Feminists in particular would be furious, not only that a man had a relationship with a younger partner, but that he circumvented the need to worship at the altar of roast beef by loving a boy instead.

The boy (Alain-Philippe Malagnac) was successful in his adult life, maintained a life-long friendship with Roger Peyrefitte, and even ended up getting married. Hardly a traumatized "victim" who was abandoned by his lover and lead into living a fruitless homosexual lifestyle.

Some boys can benefit greatly by having a male lover, and this is just one of many examples of that. The Greeks were right.

>>17789288 (OP)
I thought this nigga was banned. Instead he comes back on here to samefag his gay shit over and over.

>>17789729
It's interesting, chud. I didn't know about this, but now I do. Better than infinite Hitler/Christ threads.

lmao even their English wikipedia pages are so casual about everything. You'd think they were talking about people from the 1800s.

Do your fucking job, jannies: >>17789288 (OP)

OP is being a faggot again.

>>17789738
You didn't know that degenerates raped children and used their power/influence to get away with this? Are you retarded?

>>17789776
What is wrong with this thread and why aren't you bitching about these instead?
>>17789111
>>17789310
>>17789305

>>17789778
I didn't know it was this accepted in French society during the 20th century, retard. Something like this wouldn't have been accepted in England or the United States, for example.

>>17789787
Those threads are very clearly written by a LLM. This guy is a real person who constantly spams shotacon and thinly veiled justifications for homosexual pedophilia, it's his personal soapbox not a historical discussion.

>>17789788
Yeah man did you read the rest of his post? The purpose of this isn't to discuss tacit French acceptance of Jews raping their little boys, its written clearly with the intent of justifying homosexual pedophilia.

>>17789811
>To the surprise of nobody, he received his last rites from the Catholic Church shortly before dying in November 5, 2000, without ever being persecuted legally or socially for his open, documented pedophilic crimes.
>Why was pedophilia so normalized in French society? Is it an hereditary affliction?
Seems to be against homosexual pedophilia to me.

>>17789811
I've never once seen you doing this in any of the blatant /pol/ threads that litter this board. But any thread that has anything to do with pederasty, even in fucking ancient Greece, has you screeching for the jannies to delete an on topic, rule abiding thread.
Go back.

>>17789817
>The fact that they look happy in all photos together just tells you that the relationship wasn't abusive like feminists claim all adult-child sexual relationships to be. It was trve Aryan man/boy love, the most pure and noble form of love.


This is OP too btw, his rhetoric and diction are consistent. He also constantly samefags.

>>17789861
Maybe it isn't actually the same person?

>>17789855
Because its not a historical discussion, it's you trying to justify homosexual pedophilia. Oh and obnoxiously posting porn.

>>17789868
Stay long enough, he makes these threads constantly. You'll recognize him.

>>17789879
I'm not the pederast anon, you schizophrenic retard. I'm the one that got you to admit you're a deranged w*man that thinks adult age gaps are psychologically harmful.

>>17789902
The fuck are you even talking about nigga?

>>17789914
You are the most obvious person on this entire board by a significant margin.
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17726366/#q17738598

>>17789952
And I am the schizophrenic? You realize more than one person can take issue with a resident faggot child rapist, right?

>>17789879
Looks pretty historical to me.

>>17789956
You're the only person who does this >>17789776. You even admitted it yourself.

>He wrote openly about his homoerotic experiences in boarding school in his 1943 first novel Les amitiés particulières which won the coveted prix Renaudot in 1944
kek even occupied by Nazis frogs are still like that. kinda based

>>17789288 (OP)
Because French society was extremely secular, and I know this is going to piss a lot of people off, but alot of shit that we find morally abhorrent is perfectly "moral" under a secular moral framework.

For example incest, logically speaking sex between two consenting adult is perfectly fine, but even the most hardcore secular leftists still find incest morally abhorrent, alot of people like to use the excuse of "if it leads to pregnancy the child would have birth defects", which at the surface level appears to be logical, but if you ask them about sex between brother and brother or sister and sister, or even post menopausal mother with her children or really any combination that does not lead to pregnancy they'd still find it abhorrent. Another thing is abortion, since there's "nothing wrong" with abortion under the secular leftist moral framework you could just abort any baby that results from incest.

TL;DR what I'm trying to say is that you can either have a morality based on religion/tradition/spirituality, or you can have one that's secular but illogical, or a logical secular framework with things that basically every human who's ever lived including the most hardcore leftists will find abhorrent.

>>17790355
If only the gay nazis won.

>>17790369
>French society was extremely secular
Then why did he get Catholic rites?

>>17789707
bruh u goin to jail before the next year hopefully

>>17790331

slight problem, faggot.

>>17790705
Whether he got Catholic last rites or not we all know where he ended up.

>>17790369
This is absolutely correct. Without a framework of traditional values all things become permissible, it is why those values were instilled in the first place. Our understanding of what is acceptable and what isn't comes in large part from post-collapse narratives largely, these being a historical phenomena of people after a societal fall trying to pick the pieces back up and prevent future generations from making the same mistakes. It is a bit tangential as its not necessarily a justification for societal rules, more so an explanation of why they are there, but there is a degree of wisdom in it.

>>17790705
He did it to ritually mock the Catholic Church, a favorite past time of the Jews and their shabbos goy. He also fashioned himself as the homosexual pope, he is easily the most Jewish of any figures this OP has posted, which maybe is him conceding that he is a degenerate satanic faggot.

>Romans, Turks, French
>all religious people with strong religious institutions
>having literal sex slaves and raping castrated little boys in the ass is considered socially acceptable as long as you have some kids with some wife who has no rights, cant leave the house and isnt even seen as human
>religion gets btfo by facts and logic
>slavery banned, rape is seen as abominable even if its your wife, children are completely off limits to even touch
>but people can have sex according to their own free will
>"Its a lack of religion why we are so immoral these days"

>>17790355
It was less so that French people are like that and more so that a certain elite and parasitic class of French aristocracy is like that. Much like the brits the Jews had wormed their way into the upper classes of French nobility and especially in France began instituting the rape of gentile children as a libertine form of self-expression. It comes from a place of deep narcissism and inspires it in the adopters of this species of rape, they care little about the child and even less about sexual gratification. They revel in being able to do it openly and having luckless/stupid gentiles throw their children into the furnace for a chance at upwards social mobility. We see a very similar thing, albeit much more crude, occurring in the U.S with Hollywood. There is an anecdote of Steven Spielberg approaching a mother and her 10 something year old daughter in a restaurant as a "casting opportunity" for the movie Poltergeist. She wound up dying at age 13 from an anal infection, if some blind items are to be believed it was as a result of being sodomized essentially to death by quite a few connected producers.

>>17791167
There are so many insane reaches and pop-historical disinfo factoids in this post, but I'll go ahead and address one. Slavery and homosexuality were banned long before the hyper rational world view of the the enlightenment reached prominence. We had a brief a lapse in the acceptance of the former of these two, but I don't think I need to tell you who was behind that.

I mean it is factually historical. I'm sure pedOP would be happy to provide more historical examples with primary and secondary sources. I don't see why it should be deleted just because it's an uncomfortable subject matter. Perhaps you could provide historical counterpoints?

>>17791127
How new?
>>17791150
>Our understanding of what is acceptable and what isn't comes in large part from post-collapse narratives largely
messianic jews were already spreading their values in Rome well before it collapsed.
Also, Peyrefitte wasn't a jew.
>>17791182
While that anon is wrong, he's just doing the same thing you niggers do. He decided in advance what he thinks reality should be based on his personal values and is twisting the truth to match it instead of basing his beliefs around the truth.

>>17789288 (OP)
>>17789707
jelly about this cutie

>>17791369
>be public, intellectual figure in french society
>write popular book about two schoolboys having a homosexual relationship with each other
>filmmaker decides to make a movie based on the script, movie is well received
>on the set you meet a 12 year old aristocratic boy who was a massive fan of the book, sign his book
>end up having an open homosexual relationship with this boy despite the fact that you are a 57 year old man
>you even end up officially adopting the boy
>end up writing memoirs about having sexual relations with this boy
>nobody takes objection to this, all prominent philosophers/intellectuals support your right to love boys
Has society regressed? How did we become so hysterical?

>>17791440
*based on the book

>>17791440
The contrast between him and Bjorn Andresen is rather interesting. They were born only four years apart and the men who were enamored with them were born only one year apart. And Andresen was older when he was in his gay movie. And yet he was super negative about it.
I know it's only two samples of one, but maybe Nords really are less gay.

>>17791440
And I guess the boys parents were totally ok with it too.

>>17791538
We will never know because God smited that faggot soon after so now these two lovers can burn in hell together forever.

>>17791538
Maybe he felt like he missed out, because for all the comments made towards him, nobody ever actually fucked him. Sexual repression can cause this kind of regret. He was also massively overrated, and definitely not deserving of the moniker of the most beautiful boy in the world. I only ever see trannies fawning over him.

>>17791194
Because he is a disgusting faggot that uses these threads to try and justify homosexual pedophilia. Most homosexual rumors from antiquity and later history are tabloid tier gossip and most of the secondary sources coincidentally come from modern (19th century onwards) faggots deeply entrenched in academia.

>>17791364
Nigga you got caught in a lie, most people here think you are a disgusting faggot and just because you turned your modem on and off again doesn't change that.

because hitler didn't finish the job

>>17791569
People were already saying he was gay and he was getting upset about it when he was still a teen. So it definitely isn't a matter of missing out.
He also served as the model for European inspired male beauty in manga and anime, so he was/is definitely popular with more than just trannies.
>>17791544
>We will never know
What are you talking about? That Malagnac was more OK with being gay than Andresen isn't in question.
And dying when you're 49 seems preferable to me than losing your infant son. I don't subscribe to the idea that any God was punishing any of these men. But if you do, then it would appear as though it was Andresen.

>>17791364
He was a 20th century French diplomat, he worked in service of Jews

>>17791600
Holy fucking shit you're retarded. Seriously, just go back.

>>17791654
You were trying to demonstrate how easy it was to change your IP I assume. Maybe that's a bit too mentally complex for you though, I was assuming a bit too much of your retarded ass, wasn't I?

>>17791167
>slavery banned
They just came up with the more PC indentured labour, the coolie system and forced labour.

>rape is seen as abominable even if its your wife
More like it's okay to SA or have sex with minors as long as is poorer than you or part of a vulnerable minority group, you do it in a poor country/colony/part of the coutnry, and/or you can threaten them with silence or violence.

>>17791671
Are you afflicted by some kind of curse that prevents you from making cogent rebuttals? You admitted yourself, unprompted, that you are the same anon that was bitching in the other threads. Despite this, you still thought to try and deny it with the absence of a (you) as if you were fresh off the boat from r*ddit, as your persistent screaming for jannies already suggested. And then you started talking about being "caught in a lie" which makes no sense at all in the context of the argument except as some sort of supremely retarded and unprovoked projection.
You're awful at this. Truly awful. I don't know if you're a child, a third worlder, or merely retarded. But it's clear that you suffer from some sort of profound cognitive impairment.

>>17791719
I didn't admit I was anyone, I admitted that I found you personally repugnant. You tried to insinuate I was someone I wasn't, I proved you were wrong.

>>17791150
>Without a framework of traditional values all things become permissible,
Rape, fraud, theft and pedophilia ARE Christcuck 'traditional values' you retarded shitskin.

>>17792006
You seem far from home

>You seem far from home

>>17792038
The sharty school shooting club is down the hallway and below the balcony, just jump down to get there faster.

>>17792041
Hit a nerve, didn't it Lopez?

>>17792006
facts