Are Africans who carry the Indo-European genes considered white?

>>17790913 (OP)
Haplogroup is all that matters

>>17790913 (OP)
No but they can be considered dark aryans

>>17790913 (OP)
R1b isn't exclusively indo european btw. Common among WHG.

>>17790918
The people who say this are the same ones who will never pass on their haplogroup.

>>17790913 (OP)
That subclade of R1b isn't Indo-European

>>17790913 (OP)
I refuse to be a part of the schizoid """white""" gestalt
>inb4 not schizoid
ok retard, if you can't pinpoint to me on your genealogical tree where you got the r1b allele you're not white (pro-tip : you can't)
I can pinpoint the ethnogenesis of my established race just fine in my genealogical tree. You can't. That means I have more ancestral and bloodline connection to my race than you. Suck it, steppenig larpers.

>>17790918
Haploshit is nearly worthless and only became a meme in the early days of archaeogenetics when people only knew how to sequence Y-DNA.

>>17790955
>>17790996
Only people with pleb/serf haplogroups (for example farmoids) dismiss haplogroups. Paternal ancestry is all that matters.

>>17791048
>paternal ancestry he can't pinpoint on his genealogical tree
bet you have at least one close family member who ran out on his partner when it came to raising kids; only bastards are afraid of tracking down their bloodlines and cope in a myriad of way
>"uhm acshully my '''ancestor''' removed by 15000 generations introduced some allele nobody gives a shit about in X region of Europe, I am SO stocked on whiteness right now"
kek, so desperate

>>17790996
Your male line descendants will always share an entire chromosome with you, female line descendants will essentially be unrelated in several generations.

>>17791078
>female line descendants will essentially be unrelated in several generations.
not even close to being true

>>17791076
I can smell your cope from my monitor, brownling

>>17791099
I'm not the one fabricating some antediluvian history to larp as a continuation of because daddy never told mommy his name and you have to pick up the pieces
my race has history behind it, as in written baptismal records, familial cross-region gatherings (next one in 2026 with about a hundred attendants, now THIS is something to get stocked on), our name is estamped on tombstones, monuments and city halls and churches all over the countryside . Yours has steppenig haploautism. I rest my case

>>17790913 (OP)
Are Europeans who carry the African genes R1b White?

>>17791048
>>17791099
>saaaar I am an r1a aryan steppe warrior bloody bitch benchod, phul sapport for polska-bharat friendship <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

>>17791082
>Daughter has half your DNA
>Grandson has a quarter
>Great Grandson has 12.5%
>Fourth generation has 6.3%
>Fifth has 3.1%
>Sixth has 1.5%
>Seventh 0.8%

>>17791244
And haplogroup markers are less than 0.1% of our DNA you retard. And they mutate every few generations.

That particular subclade of R1b is pre-Indo-European. It is first found in WHGs, later EEFs who gave it to africans in some unknown migration. Actually R1b in general is much more diverse than R1a, which is entirely from Corded Ware. R1b even has central asian WSHG clades in Kazkahs.

>>17791179
R1b is entirely eurasian core.

>>17790996
>I have more relevant ancestry with Tutankhamun or a goat herder in Niger than I would my maternal grandfather if he happened to be R1a
Seems implausible anon
t. R1b (L-21) Scot

>>17790913 (OP)
"Indo-European" is Siberian, not white.
White is Paleo European.

>>17790918
>>17791048
>>17791099
No cause your haplogroup is only a very minor part of your dna and R itself is not white but siberian

>>17791662
Also this
I dont get why wignats are proud to be rapebabies of siberians
Only white haplogroup is I

Is that where those autistic nigerians come from?

(Also who's in the red spot above kazakhstan)

>>17791321
Yes but it reflects your origins you fucking retard, if you’re from a family that traces its origins to a different country only Y dna can prove it

What if we grouped people based kn haplogroups?

Imagine not being I1

Always love the illiteracy and hypercope about how you can't even read scientific papers, understand clading nor understand such simple genetic concepts without autocoping itt

>>17790913 (OP)
>central africa
it's a coincidence. these traits are determined by like, a couple nucleobases in the chromosomes. it's not like some bwc aryan kang flew down over there and decided to knock some ebony queens up or anything.

>>17793342
The narrative is that civilization magically appeared in 4000 BC, which is just when Indo-Europeans conquered already existing civilizations. So, there's a lot of self-congratulatory bias there.

>>17790913 (OP)
Niger
Nigeria

>>17791244
Only true if your entire local population is totally mixed with the global population in each generation.
Which doesn't happen. Most people remain local, marry local people and have kids locally.
Meaning you have a family, a clan and a nation which shares large portions of your DNA.

>>17793900
>Aryan
No, probably a farmer from Iberia or Italy.
>coincidence
This doesn't really work that way.

>>17793507
No because you dont know when that ydna entered that area

>>17793995
>probably a farmer from iberia or italy
*maybe* a carthaginian sailor with italic-iberian admixture knocked up some ebony queens, maybe.

>>17795146
Its way older

>>17795153
okay, maybe a small indo european group managed to go across the sahara right before it really really dried up, around like 4000-3000 BC

>>17795296
perhaps 6000-4000 BC

>>17790913 (OP)
no, the white people who created a colony around lake chad were genetically diluted out of existence in the sea of black

>>17795296
Maybe the so-called Indo-European haplogroup was actually a subset of the previous Atlantean subgroup that gave way to Phoenicians and eventual Indo-Europeans.