Is the Holy Roman Empire the true successor of the Roman Empire?
>Had Rome as its capital
> continued Roman Culture & Christianity for 1,000 years
>Blessed by the Pope
>Holy Roman Emperors are called Kaisers.

>>17796420 (OP)
No because it's superior

Technically yes. If you read all documents written in Italy, Spain, Germany, England, France, Portugal and all the West prior to XVIII century. It was referred as the Empire. The rulers were called Caesars and Emperors.

Nobody prior to XVIII/XIX centuries referred to other nations peaks as "empires" because there was just one single empire. The Roman. That survived guided by Franks and the Church.

>>17796478
based, i am a roman then as a white american with german blood and latinx are not

>>17796420 (OP)
This thread again?

obligatory canned response
the holy roman empire is neither holy nor roman

they're seething lads
us germanics won

>>17796499
>le quote
>said by a frog 9 centuries after the empire was founded
back to /r/history midwit
This board is for high IQ Chads only

>>17796420 (OP)
>>Had Rome as its capital
What?

>>17796420 (OP)
The pope is the Antichrist

>>17796420 (OP)
It was the Churches attempt to segregate the Germoid tribal hordes from Civilized Europe

>>17796420 (OP)
>Had Rome as its capital
Only a single Emperor had Rome as the capital and it was only for a few years. Being Otto III. Most Emperors never even controlled Rome

>>17796420 (OP)
It wasn't because.......IT JUST WASN'T OK!!!

>>17796420 (OP)
No, they were Christcucks.
Only pagans can be considered Roman. Hail Jupiter!