>Doesn’t speak Sumerian, Akkadian, or any language from Mesopotamia and instead speaks Arabic, a language from the Arabian peninsula
>Doesn’t follow the native Mesopotamian religion and instead follows Islam, a religion from the Arabian peninsula
>Doesn’t have any cultural or genetic ties to the ancient Mesopotamians most of its inhabitants primarily descend from Arab invaders who conquered and raped the native Mesopotamians out of existence (who even by that time, stopped speaking Akkadian and Sumerian in favor of Aramaic and stopped following the native Mesopotamian religion in favor of Christianity)
>Persecutes the Assyrians, the only group with any real cultural and genetic ties to ancient Mesopotamian. But even then, they don’t speak Akkadian or Sumerian and instead Aramaic nor do they follow the ancient Mesopotamian religion and instead follow Christianity
Modern Iraq has no claim to ancient Mesopotamia
Even their name doesn’t have any Mesopotamian roots and instead comes from the Middle Persian word “Eraq” meaning “lowland” (because the region was the lowest part of the Sassanid empire).
Just as modern Jews lie about being descended from the ancient Israelites, Iraqis lie about being descended from the ancient Mesopotamians

>>17798668 (OP)
What's up with chuds rehashing
"Modern X has no ties with Y" BS. This shit is so tired and played out.

>>17798673
Because it’s true
If you don’t speak Akkadian or Sumerian and if you don’t follow the ancient Mesopotamian religion, then you have no real ties to ancient Mesopotamia

>>17798668 (OP)
>Doesn’t have any cultural or genetic ties to the ancient Mesopotamians most of its inhabitants primarily descend from Arab invaders who conquered and raped the native Mesopotamians out of existence (who even by that time, stopped speaking Akkadian and Sumerian in favor of Aramaic and stopped following the native Mesopotamian religion in favor of Christianity)
Maybe not cultural but they have genetic ties. Most of the DNA they have is from before Arabs.
>Just as modern Jews lie about being descended from the ancient Israelites, Iraqis lie about being descended from the ancient Mesopotamians
Jews descend from Israelites but they had to mix with other ethnicities so their numbers could rebound. Samaritans are almost 100% Israelite and they have less than a thousand people now.

>>17798673
>chuds
Arab cultural imperialism is very real. There are so many self-hating Pakis, Indians, and Indonesians that despise their own ethnic heritage and wish so badly to be arabs instead and take arab names.

Assyrians have not genetic ties to Mesopotamians, retard.

>>17798699
By that logic byzantine was not roman

>>17798771
>that despise their own ethnic heritage and wish so badly to be arabs instead and take arab names.

Yusuf, dawod, musa, isa, firdows etc... are not Arab names, but Quranic.

Even names like "Muhammed" despite having Arabic roots, it only came to be a name after Muhammed.

>>17798781
>Quranic
All names in the Quran are Arab names you dickhead

>>17798882

No it's not retard. Yusuf is not Arab name. dumb faggot. It's Quranic.

Muhammed is the only one you could argue with arabic roots, but still, this name only comes into existence after Islam, pagan Arabs never call their sons 'Muhammed" it's a Quranic expression.

>>17798882
Are biblical names greek to you aswell?

>>17798668 (OP)
>>17798699
>akkadians
Semetic invaders

OP is a retard who doesn't know anything about the shit he spews

>>17799049
No, they’re Jewish names because the Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew

>>17798771
>Arab cultural imperialism is very real.
Outside of Sudan I don't see that being the case. The case of Sudan came from outside factors of the Anglo-Egyptian joint rule stigmatized and pressuring non-Arabic languages and the later on Omar Bashir (the OG chudjack) following up on stigmatizing non-Arabic linguistic and cultural expressions.

>>17799068
Are new testament names Hebrew too?

>>17798777
Except Constantinople had actual political continuity with the classical Roman Empire

>>17798668 (OP)
> arabs, who have higher affinity with near east natives than indojeets ever will, took over the region and created a new page in history
> foreigner/sword leftover that lives oceans away can't stand seeing a yung nigga on his hustle, so he resorts to mexican/injun talking points that appeal to modern concepts like muh indigenousness muh nativity muh we wuz here first. stuff that has no bearing on its own
> stuck on misconceptions about "arab replacement of iraq" despite the fact that near eastern natives converted to islam willingly and the christoids that didnt aligned with Muslims over zoroastrians
> ignores the fact that arabic has a lot in common with aramaic and is in the same language family, unlike iranic languages
> ignores the fact that indoiranjeets were the first to invade the region and turn it from a prosperous collection of city states to a singular failed war state that ended up getting raped and balkanized by smaller populations of greeks
> deliberately invents a lie about the etymology of Iraq because even he knows that the topic is a huge low effort troll post.
this is sad considering how many of you brag about graduating from universities in the US and Europe and how much smarter you are than der araben.
you need to come up with something other than "we were here first". you're gonna get wedgied and tossed back home to berlin or stockholm every single time you try to pull this nonsense.