Historically, why have so few political leaders opposed the international elite who manipulate markets, influence interest rates, and create financial instruments that increase their wealth while shifting debt and risk onto the working population?

>>17804593 (OP)
>international elite who manipulate markets, influence interest rates, and create financial instruments that increase their wealth while shifting debt and risk onto the working population?
This is a dogwhistle for "I'm a loser and am seething about countries more successful than me" which is why every third world shithole adopts this ideology

>>17804593 (OP)
Because contrary to what schizos believe banks mean nothing in the end, they do not create wealth, the means of production creates wealth.

>>17804598
>they do not create wealth
Not directly, but they do control the flow of capital and influence the means of production by financing industries and shaping economic policies, often prioritizing elite interests over the working population.

>>17804593 (OP)
Because on a level of politics high enough to affect this in any meaningful way you have to cooperate with plenty of people who are a part of this system or directly benefit from it, assuming you aren't one of them if you have made it this far.

And also because most regular folk don't understand and therefore don't give a fuck about such mechanisms, so it won't win you any votes in a democracy unless you pin a blame on a well chosen scapegoat

>>17804593 (OP)
>Historically, why have so few political leaders opposed the international elite who manipulate markets, influence interest rates, and create financial instruments
Pic not related.

>>17804902
Right.

>>17805104
fake quote

There have, but you hate them for it

>>17804598
The means of production are the only things which create value, but banking and in particular usury robs the working class of the real value of their money while simultaneously creating a parasitic class that can influence politics and the economy to their ends. A factory owner has a limited scope to their goals and is only allowed so much power in any political system, a banker can shape the world by lending something of no value to those that need it in order to convert their labor into goods.

>>17804598
>banks mean nothing
Then close all your accounts and cut up your debit and credit cards.

>>17805611
Source: Letter from Heinrich Brüning to Daniel Longwell; Longwell collection, Butler Library, Columbia University, New York City.

>>17806544
Your image is wrong then because it says it's a letter to Churchill. Maybe fix the image if you intend to post it in every thread

>>17806553
My understanding of what happened, based on that source, which is another letter he wrote, is that Brüning claims to have written that letter privately to Churchill in 1937. This was completely private between him and Churchill and none of this came to light until after WW2, when Churchill wanted to publish the 1937 letter as the war trials were going on. Brüning refused to give permission to Churchill to publish that letter because he didn't want it to be used as evidence against Germans in the post-war trials.

>>17805830
Just...just say Jews, ok?

>>17805842
that didn't actually disprove his argument

>>17806621
>stop holding richfags accountable and waste your time with directionless racism instead
No.

>>17806621
Of course it is Jews, but more than just Jews charge interest at this stage in our world. The most crushing blow you can deliver to Jews is an end to Usury and it also fixes all the other problems while simultaneously not directly antagonizing them through asset seizure and expulsion.

>>17804593 (OP)
pic rel clowns didn't oppose it but wanted their share of loot. And more.

>>17804593 (OP)
from there homebase in london, since king henry viii days, there british empire tentacles have spread far