Anonymous
7/1/2025, 9:56:03 AM No.17805679
KEK
Replies:
Thread 17805679 - /his/ [Archived: 675 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 9:56:43 AM No.17805680
It kinda did though
Replies:
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 10:09:12 AM No.17805696
>>17805680
when exactly?
when exactly?
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 10:34:55 AM No.17805733
Thing you don't understand is Gen Xers ride the high so much that their generation voted in the change that used the power of rock and roll to tear down that wall Mr. Gorbachov.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 11:41:34 AM No.17805818
>>17805679 (OP)
>2025
>99% of the world's working class is actively voting against its own interest
>they're willing to die for that shit
there is no hope
>2025
>99% of the world's working class is actively voting against its own interest
>they're willing to die for that shit
there is no hope
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 11:43:44 AM No.17805820
>>17805679 (OP)
They didn't, "trickle down" is the pejorative term for supply-side economics. Not one proponent of supply-side ever said that pure maximization of income would lead to the rich spreading their wealth around for some reason. The idea is lowering taxes/regulations will increase productivity, which has a strong relationship with higher wages. Win-win right? Of course it's never that simple since not all "productivity" is made equal, especially in a financialized service economy. That's why I don't see myself among the supply-side proponents. Nonetheless, they're not the ones who came up with the 'trickle-down' shit, that was explicitly coined explicitly in opposition to them.
They didn't, "trickle down" is the pejorative term for supply-side economics. Not one proponent of supply-side ever said that pure maximization of income would lead to the rich spreading their wealth around for some reason. The idea is lowering taxes/regulations will increase productivity, which has a strong relationship with higher wages. Win-win right? Of course it's never that simple since not all "productivity" is made equal, especially in a financialized service economy. That's why I don't see myself among the supply-side proponents. Nonetheless, they're not the ones who came up with the 'trickle-down' shit, that was explicitly coined explicitly in opposition to them.
