Did Otto Frank modify Anne Frank's diary at all?

>>17814315 (OP)
he added all the sexual parts in order to make it sell to the perverts getting off over a dead girl's personal exploration

Anne frank never wrote a diary.
Its a jewish fairytale to sell books and infiltrate governments through advertisement

What do you think Aipac is funded on? Vibes? Essays? It works through jewish Holohoax NGOs

>>17814339
Yes she did. Wikipedia says after the Secret Annex was raided, the Nazis decided to leave them there. Otto Frank got them at the end of the war

It was real in his mind

>>17814406
https://youtu.be/Cd_GvptRLd0?si=JuqslJ_8m30QFaJW&t=118

>>17814328
>sexual parts are only in the editions published decades after his death

What did he mean by this?

>>17814372
That not even what Wikipedia says but go off I guess.

>>17814315 (OP)
Isn't he the one that got caught diddling her?

>>17814315 (OP)
>modify it
i sure don't know but i asked chatgpt about that when it first came out. oh man, it was "enraged", so much text. that pretty much convinced me she probably didn't have anything to do with it and chatgpt is some agenda bs not worth messing with.

>>17814481
No, because you just made that up.

Regular reminder that ballpoint pens were not available to consumers until the 1950s. Additional reminder that Diary of a Young Girl was first published in 1947. Meaning that it cannot have been written in ballpoint pen and therefore anyone who claims it was is lying directly to your face.

>>17814492
Train it better

>>17814595
she used ink and pencil
annotations was later added with ballpoint pen

>>17815024
Correct. She even writes about using a fountain pen in the diary itself.

>>17815013
>better
it was a simple question that should have yielded a sentence at most. instead the response was a page or more with multiple things that had nothing to do with the question. but likely part of a trained narrative. like your example. probably copy-paste of some facebookage.

>>17814339

Shut the fuck up nigger

>>17816919
>diary is accurate
Why did the artist get this right? Was he genuinely an Anne Frank fan?

>>17814315 (OP)
He edited it for publishing, with the companies who published it adding additional changes. Version histories have been available for a long time now.