All modern large civilized societies are divided into two types: fascist society and liberal society.
There are more fascists in the world than liberals. The fascist society has three criteria:
1. Military duty
2. Prohibition on the free carrying and storage of military weapons
3. Compulsory education at school, only one official language

The question is how do liberals live in a world where fascism has won?

Up

>>17815005 (OP)
Does that make Communists hyper liberals???

>>17815056
Communists are fascists and there is a name for this "red fascism". Liberalism is not about a strong society, liberals fight against strong societies for their own freedom.

Up

>>17815005 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bss0kK_bz8

>>17815005 (OP)
>infographic

>>17815005 (OP)
I disagree. Majority of countries are communist. Communism is when government exists. Therefore almost all world is controlled by the communists.


See how stupid drawing arbitrary definitions is?

>>17815436
You misunderstood the iron law of oligarchy. It's not about all organisations being oligarchical but rather that they all tend towards oligarchy. The way you're presenting it, it gives an "escape rout" that maybe with the right organisation oligarchical rule can be avoided while Michels study of the SPD dealt with exactly that being false.

>>17815648
you are stupid

>>17815829
I am not. The germanic tribes of the early middle ages met all but the 3rd criteria of fascism you've listed and that's because they didn't have much of an education system to begin with(although from what we know of their upbringing we could kind of stretch it).
The Chinese communists technically have all 3 but 1 is never practiced because there's always enough volunteers. I guess they're at worst as fascist as the Longobards but at best they're less fascist than longobards, same applies to the US between 1941 and 1980's when compulsory military service was abandoned, I guess they just decided to be 2/3rd fascist for 40 years and abandoned fascism on a whim.

The descriptors you provide are so generic that they can't be viable way of differentiating fascism unless you want to turn it into abstract neutral word to be put between terms such as the lower house, the government or the economy rather than a descriptor of a particular political system.

>>17815865
Are you a complete moron? We are talking about modern large societies living in a civilization.

These three criteria make it possible to highlight the general essence and expose society as it really is.
Communists are fascists and there is a name for this "red fascism"

>>17815005 (OP)
>2. Prohibition on the free carrying and storage of military weapons
This seems like some kind of schizo libertarian garbage. Nazi Germany fully encouraged private gun ownership.

>The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. But under the new law:
>Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, and the possession of ammunition.[9]
>The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.[10][11]
>Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.[10]
>Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[9]
>Manufacture of arms and ammunition continued to require a permit, with the provision that such permits would no longer be issued to any company even partly owned by Jews; Jews could not manufacture or deal in firearms or ammunition.[9]

>On the whole, gun laws were actually made less stringent for German citizens who were loyal to Nazi rule and more restrictive for Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_Germany#Gun_regulations_in_Nazi_Germany

>>17816490
>This seems like some kind of schizo libertarian garbage. Nazi Germany fully encouraged private gun ownership.
Where did you get this information? The Internet says the opposite. So there is only one schizophrenic here and that is you.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_Germany#Gun_regulations_in_Nazi_Germany
You really don't understand the difference between a hunting weapon and a combat weapon? You're mentally sound, aren't you? It is noteworthy that not all Germans could obtain even hunting weapons without problems, but only those who were ideologically faithful.

>>17815673
>iron law
another

Up