Disprove Fomenko without using mainstream history

>>17817055 (OP)
You are brown and love kpop. Thus your advocacy of Fomenko is objectively shit.

>>17817062
I'm not

>>17817083
Whatever you say pacomenko.

>>17817062
>>17817093
>Thus your advocacy of Fomenko
i'm not advocating for Fomenko

>The new chronology is a pseudohistorical theory proposed by Anatoly Fomenko who argues that events of antiquity generally attributed to the ancient civilizations of Rome, Greece and Egypt actually occurred during the Middle Ages, more than a thousand years later.
>The theory further proposes that world history prior to AD 1600 has been widely falsified to suit the interests of a number of different conspirators, including the Vatican, the Holy Roman Empire, and the Russian House of Romanov, all working to obscure the "true" history of the world centered around a global empire called the "Russian Horde".
>The new chronology features a totally reconstructed timeline, portraying a history that is radically shorter than what is universally accepted, based on a thesis that in effect compresses all of recorded history from the Neolithic to the Early Middle Ages into a period less than a millennium long. According to Fomenko's claims, the practice of written history only emerged c.800 AD, with there being almost no real information about events that occurred between 800 and 1000 AD, and most recorded historical events actually having taken place between 1000 and 1500 AD.

>>17817238
>the practice of written history only emerged c.800 AD, with there being almost no real information about events that occurred between 800 and 1000 AD, and most recorded historical events actually having taken place between 1000 and 1500 AD.
lets start here. The Herculaneum Scrolls prove that there was writing about History in the ancient past, disproving a central part of Fomenko's theory.
Moreover there are a few other manuscripts that have survived directly from antiquity, such as the Codex Vergilianus, though that isn't a history text.
There are also the papyri from Egypt, which have yielded fragments from, amongst other historical works, a lost autobiography by Hadrian.

>>17817247
and they disprove fomenko?

>>17817325
there was never a great russian horde, eclipses can be matched up with those which happened in antiquity meaning there aren't missing years either.

>>17817831
Can you prove a single one of these claims? You're just saying things you don't agree with. We have to have these threads because OP is basically right- people who disagree with Fomenko usually just assert opinions without any basis, assuming the narrative.

>>17817831
>eclipses can be matched up with those which happened in antiquity
I've very eager to see how you are definitely certainly going to prove this. The funniest thing about Fomenkoism on social media is every time Illig or any of these other theorists get mentioned contrarians in the comments are like "we know this is true because it must be" and Fomenko literally BTFO this argument in the first few pages of his first book and nobody saying they know how to reconstruct celestial alignments knows how to do it and it's painfully obvious they're (you're) making a claim you know you can't possibly prove.

>>17817877
>>17817897
see the main problem with arguing this out further is that you'll just dismiss any evidence to the contrary, thus making it impossible to actually argue any point against Fomenko, even something as ridiculous as something like the Russian Horde he talks about is.

>>17817055 (OP)


YOU CANNOT JUST PICK A RANDOM NAME, AND ASK «DISPROVE HIM».

THAT IS NOT HOW REFUTATIONS WORK.

>>17818145
i just thought there would be an easy way to disprove it if it's pseudoscience

>>17817986
I'm not defending his constructions, in fact there were no Slavs prior to the medieval period, but his deconstructions are rock solid. If you claim to have the celestial calculations then show them. There's an obvious reference to them so let's see it. Fomenko deconstructed it,but surely you can counter him. If you want his quotations I'll post them later but they're on Internet Archive.

You can disprove Fomenko if you can disprove the Russian horde and the Russian origin of Latin alphabet. The problem of the Westerners is that no one so far has been capable of this.