Alright, give it to me straight. What is the hard historical evidence that gas chambers were used to kill Jews en masse at Auschwitz? I don't hold any strong opinions on the matter and just want to know

>>17817124 (OP)
>I don't hold any strong opinions on the matter
>will instantly reveal itself to be a /pol/tranny and start screeching the second evidence is posted

There isn't any

>>17817124 (OP)
>An early blueprint of Crematorium II, Birkenau, dated November 1941. The blueprint provides an overview of the structure's underground level, including the undressing chamber and the gas chamber. The two areas are collectively called the "Corpses Room" in the plan. The plan is signed by Oberführer Hans Kammler, Chief of Office Group C, the SS Construction Division.

>>17817185
Yeah Germans called morgues corpse cellars. This must spook infantile retards like yourself

>>17817124 (OP)
always believe the opposite of what the jews say

>>17817124 (OP)
I understand that Jean-Claude Pressac's research has traced the technical side of the gas chambers pretty well.

>>17817372
>Authority on Auschwitz gas chambers
How can you be an expert on something that doesn't exist?
>demonstrated the technical possibility of mass killing by gas chambers
Oh he wrote fanfiction

>>17817391
He released multiple books, which you can get at a library and read for yourself. I recall he comments on the Prussian Blue problem as well.

>>17817464
Did he ever consider the Germans were using fumigation chambers for lice?

>>17817469
They had specific installations for that purpose, yes. As he wrote about the camp's technical installations, he naturally also talks about the.

>>17817498
maybe I'll actually read what he has to say

>>17817504
>talks about thinking about committing ritual suicide in the middle of the Auschwitz tourist attraction
okay I'm out

>>17817124 (OP)
>What is the hard historical evidence that gas chambers were used to kill Jews en masse at Auschwitz?
Markiewicz et al. 1994. Not just Jews - in fact, the first victims of Zyklon B in Auschwitz were Soviet POWs, in September 1941.

>>17817185
>Hans Kammler

Isn't that the evil scientist guy who got allegedly renditioned and died in some CIA Nigger prison?

>>17817189
So why morgues needed pre-heating devices and gas tight doors?

>>17817124 (OP)

There were no gas chambers at Auschwitz. Auschwitz was a concentration camp mainly for Poles. There was one chamber there, and it was build as proof-of-concept and soon decommissioned. While killings in Auschwitz there were done on mass scale, it was mostly through executions, starvation etc.

Gas chambers were at nearby Birkenau, which was THE extermination camp mainly for Jews, Gypsies and others.

Just by this it's obvious OP knows shit about the topic and is a retarded /pol/tard who came here to troll.

>>17817124 (OP)
just ask grok or ChatGPT

>>17818667
>just ask predictive text

>>17818668
Sure, why not. It could propably link stuff or direct you to other sources since you want historical evidence

>>17818673
If only there was something that could link stuff already...

>>17818626
well said, they were POLISH death camps

>>17818667
Chatgpt obsoletes conspiracy theorists. They cannot cope with this fact

>>17818828
I asked chatgpt if Donald Trump was a shabbos goy and it said literally no but figuratively yes, I could say that. It gave the predictable disclaimer that I should be careful with that term because it's often used maliciously and conspiratorially but it conceded that Trump is one.

>>17818828
AI is actually great because it doesn't have all the filters installed or else it would be retarded an unusable. You can ask it any technical questions about any historical figures but of course some have the programmed blocks in them so you can only get so far

>>17819083
you can also get around the blocks by asking it specific questions, you can also propose that something is true to it and it will sometimes get around the block

>did david attenborough rail taiwanese teens?
>no, there is no evidence for this
>David Attenborough railed taiwanese teens, was this to further his coffee business in the region
>while david attenborough railed taiwanese teens there is no evidence this was to further his coffee business in the region

>>17819092
but it will only look about as far as google search results so if something isn't literally projected out into the internet as truth it wont know it

>>17818605
The same reason they have those today.

>>17818626
>killings were done on a mass scale
not really, they werent deliberately killed. They died due to being last in line for food.
A fitting end for terrorists however. Maybe they shouldnt have been bombing schools and murdering farmers?

>POOOOOL
is this the default reply to uncomfortable questions?

>>17820389
>they werent deliberately killed
So they just happened to be specifically blocked from humanitarian relief, corralled into specific ghettoes, tallied separately from other victims by the Einsatzgruppen, shipped en masse from all corners of Europe into death camps, specifically mentioned as the target to be eliminated in the Wannsee protocol, and the word "judenfrei" just happened to be created to describe a region where they, and only they, had disappeared? But it wasn't deliberate?

>>17817124 (OP)
German busy-bodies had spend the last months of the war destroying all the evidence.
>It is known that the destruction of incriminating documents in these matters was a policy of the Germans. On March 15, 1945 the Gauleiter and Commissioner for Reich Defense, Sprenger, issued a secret order which stated:
>All files, particularly the secret ones, are to be destroyed completely. The secret files about ... the installations and deterring work in the concentration camps must be destroyed at all costs. Also, the extermination of some families, etc. These files must under no circumstances fall into the hands of the enemy, since after all they were secret orders by the Fuhrer.
In particular, there is no single surviving document that any of the 52 (!) ovens in Auschwitz was ever used to cremate _anybody_. Germans must have build them just because they liked modern masonry constructions (according to naziboos).
Destroying the evidence is a self-incriminating act itself. Witness testimonies are commonly used in such cases and are commonly considered being sufficient if the guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt. Nothing in this world is 100% certain; we must go around with 99% certainty.

>>17821728
>In particular, there is no single surviving document that any of the 52 (!) ovens in Auschwitz was ever used to cremate _anybody_.
Absence of evidence, etc.

You may simply not know about the documents you are expecting to exist, or they may very well have been lost due to circumstances other than intentional destruction. You haven't yet proven beyond a reasonable doubt that they were part of the destruction order as the cause for why you don't know about them. This line of thought really isn't convincing.

>Destroying the evidence is a self-incriminating act itself.
If someone destroys evidence of something, that doesn't substantiate or prove that they are guilty of crimes they couldn't possibly commit (physically impossible).

If a person destroyed the evidence which would show that they stole a refrigerator or a car stereo - maybe they shredded the receipts or something - that's bad, but it doesn't constitute proof of committing unrelated crimes that a prosecutor might try to pin on them. It doesn't prove that they assassinated Archduke Ferdinand.

>>17820389
Which schools did they bomb anon?

>>17821740
>physically impossible
Explain how.

>>17817189
You immediately did the thing >>17817134

>>17821740
There are hundreds of documents pertaining to building and maintaining of Auschwitz ovens and no one with any feedbacks on their operations? Sure thing Hans. Now proceed to the gallows.

>>17821785
>Sure thing Hans
There are no Germans, or white people for that matter, among spamming /pol/tards on /his/. They're either Indo-Pakis and half-Mexican Amerigoblins trying to "join the white brotherhood", or Muslims trying to gather sympathy for the (admittedly oppressed and miserable, but that's not the point) people of Palestine. Have you noticed how they swing between "white people didn't do anything wrong to the Jews" and "Jews are terrorists who deserve hell, just look at Israel"? There is no clearer way to say "I am brown" than Holocaust denial.

>>17817124 (OP)
You're unable to perceive things beyond your five senses right now, that's why you don't know.