What is the optimal homo sapiens population?

>>17817850 (OP)
why do people think of this as being super dystopian?
most of the world's overpopulation is because of places like India and Africa
shouldn't /pol/tards be cheering attempts at controlling the third world population?

>>17817859
/pol/tards are brown themselves

imo the fewer homos the better

>>17817850 (OP)
less than 1 million

>>17817859
they are christcucks so they are against population control the same way they are against abortion
browns are god's children

>>17818759

>>17817850 (OP)

You're not allowed to think or talk about it. Let's just be impulsive and spontaneous and do whatever bro.

>>17817859
>most of the world's overpopulation is because of places like India and Africa
Africa is actually pretty underpopulated and India+China have always had high fertility rates for ages due to their location

>>17818883
Because in the end it all dwindles down to:
>making people bot/weak enough to let me get away with anything.

1 billion jav actresses

>>17817859
Because even if we could instantly remove every Sub-Saharan, every south Asian and half the Chinks, it's not like people would agree to make a massive nature reserve. A massive land rush would ensue.

>>17819167
>Because even if we could instantly remove every Sub-Saharan, every south Asian and half the Chinks
Lmao people would extend it way past that. Most of the world would get removed in reality. In fact rich people are basically bunkering down on the expectation that the vast majority of their own people will die off ordered into poverty as climate change ramps up.

>>17819167
>A massive land rush would ensue.
Militaries would move in and secure land for the rich. Land would remain under utilized and fallow because states would be able to use as future leveraging.

>>17817850 (OP)
It'll set itself, hence why birthrates have been plummeting. We went way past the comfortable carrying capacity and now the quality of life is dropping rapidly. The only people who're worried about this are boomers who're worried their pension schemes will implode, and people like Elon Musk who's businesses require ever increasing consumption

>Improving [...] diversity

>>17819167
>>17819244
>>17819234
White people are the only race to take conservation seriously. non-Whites use conservation as a form of political capital with world heritage sights or financial incentives with tourism.
it is exclusively Whites who will at their own detriment place the preservation of nature above themselves.

>>17819274
>We went way past the comfortable carrying capacity
We aren't.

>>17819324
>White people are the only race to take conservation seriously
Its pretty huge in many parts of the world.

>non-Whites use conservation as a form of political capital with world heritage sights or financial incentives with tourism.
Like everyone else? Why is that even bad?

>it is exclusively Whites who will at their own detriment place the preservation of nature above themselves.
Lmao why did start spouting this shit out of nowhere? I never said anything vaguely offensive at all.

>>17817850 (OP)
billions must die