The Tower of Babel story, when viewed through a misotheistic lens, reads not as a warning against pride, but as a moment of panic from a fragile god, confronted with the possibility that humanity might unify and transcend its assigned station.

>>17818079 (OP)
>an omniscient God panicking
Try again.

>>17818079 (OP)
>The Tower of Babel story, when viewed through a misotheistic lens
Thank you for admitting that you hate God.

>>17818080
>>17818082
Language, identity, and nationhood are all artificially imposed mechanisms to keep humanity weak and distracted.

>>17818079 (OP)
Reminds me a bit of the story of Prometheus and how he was punished when seen from that angle.

>>17818080
>And the LORD said, “Look, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down, and confuse their language there, so that they will not understand one another’s speech.”
How else do you interpret this? And why the "we" if it's just the one God? For that matter, why the "go down" if God is in all places at once?

>>17818089
>And why the "we" if it's just the one God?
Some day humanity will triumph over these alien oppressors

>>17818079 (OP)
It was a warning against globalism and race mixing.

>>17818109
>There is neither Jew nor Greek

>>17818089
>How else do you interpret this?
a warning against pride, retard, as its been interpreted for 4000 years.
>And why the "we" if it's just the one God?
Trinitarian God.
>For that matter, why the "go down" if God is in all places at once?
Why does God need to do anything if he is everything?
Have a little intellectual honesty.

>>17818129
>a warning against pride, retard, as its been interpreted for 4000 years.
So why does God care about whether they can do anything if nothing they do can affect him?
>Trinitarian God.
The Trinity is still explicitly a single God.
>Why does God need to do anything if he is everything?
Doing something is one thing, but he can't "go" somewhere because he's already there in the city and everywhere else.

>>17818116
Paul was low-key against the demiurge and his archons, so it fits.

>>17818080
>omniscient God
That was a retcon later.

>>17818079 (OP) Why don't you say as it is?
>when viewed through the lens of an atheist
Are you really that dishonest?

>>17819490
Because I'm not an atheist. I believe this god exists.

>>17818080
Why was he so mad about them building a tower then?

>>17818091
The guy in your image is Enki, who is a good Nordic who helps the humans triumph over the Reptilian oppressors

>>17818079 (OP)
The Tower of Babel comes from a Babylonian ziggurat called the “Etemenanki”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etemenanki

>>17818079 (OP)
>issues with tower of babel
until you realize that their god is "them".