When I look at Wikipedia articles I notice that alot of historical figures that never heard the term "African-American" and certainly never called themselves that being retroactively labeled as such. The truth is, many, if not most, would likely protest being retroactively labeled African via "African-American" if they weren't dead.
Am I the only one that thinks retroactively applying modern labels that didn't exist contemporary to historical figures problematic?
>>17819045 (OP)>alot of>doesn't name a single oneBait threads like this should be snipped and the OP permabanned on site
>>17819045 (OP)where's the block woman in this pic? because I can't find her.
"Hyphenated americans" is a communist thing. The US ISN'T multicultural, it has one culture, anglo culture. Leftists didn't like this so they made everything about race
>>17819045 (OP)weren't Hitler and Genghis Khan given mormon baptism or some shit?
>>17819136The US has never been "one culture" you fuckwad. It was settled by various European groups. But then you obviously never finished highschool so it's no surprise you believe otherwise
>>17819133That's because your racial make-up brings shame upon your ancestors.
>>17819174America has always been an English speaking Christian nation with british roots.
>>17819045 (OP)I agree. For example, it's very presumptuous to anachronistically refer to Jesus' disciples as "Christians" when they identified as faithful Jews.
>>17819195It's a perfect reaction for when I'm talking to manchild