How did Jews respond to this book? It contains many claims about them.

they made that word they always use

>>17820002 (OP)
You obviously didn't read it. Most of the book he rants against Weimar and his fellow Germans, not even Jews. The Original title was "My struggle against cowardice and lie" for a reason.

>>17820002 (OP) (OP)
You obviously didn't read it. Most of the book he rants against Weimar and his fellow Germans, not even Jews. The Original title was "My struggle against cowardice and lies" for a reason.

>>17820660
I only read half of the first book, but there is an entire chapter there where he rants and rage about jews.

I think you're the one who havent read shit, tho I dont blame you, the book is literal abomination and difficult to read for that reason. But why are you lying tho?

>>17820002 (OP)
It's literally Hitler just having an autistic crashout while sitting in a prison cell. The whole book reads like some schizoid chud blogpost. There's nothing of substance in it except "Jews (and Soviets) bad"

>>17820674
When I was reading it, I think the word "bourgeoisie" was mentioned like 500 million times. Far more than jews and communists.

But yes, it's basically just a rant, and it's never cohesive, the man can never stick to the topic and overexplains everything as complexly as possible. I could only get through half of the first book before I finally gave up.
Apparently, barely anyone in Germany read it either (for the same reason), despite the fact that it was given out for free at virtually every occassion.

>>17820681
>despite the fact that it was given out for free at virtually every occassion.
I find this particularly confusing, it's like the NSDAP wanted to legitimize their ideas by equating Mein Kampf with something like Das Kapital, which would've been a terrible idea. Maybe Hitler himself legitimately thought he was some misunderstood genius, which also explains why he was still seething about not being allowed into the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts. I mean even in-context, it's literally just Hitler ranting while he was in prison. He called the book "My Struggle" for Christs sake.

>>17820687
It's not confusing at all.
Mao did the same thing. It was practically law that everyone must own a copy of his manifesto book (Little Red Book). They wanted everyone to share their world view.

>>17820695
I understand that, but my point is they could've chosen something better than someones prison rant

>>17820695
Mao actually wrote a lot of coherent essays and letters though.

>>17820002 (OP)
Does it through?

>>17820671
Which chapter would that be my good retard?

>>17820002 (OP)
They picked a fight they couldn't win.

>>17820681
It's a 700 page political manifesto, it's going to be boring no matter what.
Many people are disappointed by it because they expect it to be le evil masterplan to take over the world and genocide everyone, and instead it's a rather dry long-winded criticism of the German state's geopolitics in the 1920s.

>>17820002 (OP)
Most of it isn't about jews. It's just seething about WW1 and being homeless.

>>17820736
>predicts the collapse of the USSR in a single lifetime
>names dialectical patterns that show up a century later

He was a literal prophet.

>>17820731
>non existent country declares war

>>17820742
>>names dialectical patterns that show up a century later
He didn't, and that's just apophenia anyways
>>predicts the collapse of the USSR in a single lifetime
He sure as hell didn't predict Germany losing to the USSR though despite pushing hard for war with them, he wasn't a prophet for shit

>>17820660
He speaks about the JQ in the second chapter "Years Of Study And Suffering In Vienna".
https://files.catbox.moe/kqzbd6.mp4

>>17820731
Germany is currently at war with the UK

>>17820746
It's referencing people who describe themselves as such- though I think we agree that they're not actually related to any ancient Judea.

>He didn't, and that's just apophenia anyways
He literally says "this is how they argue, here are the steps" and that is how his opponents argue step-by-step. Keep going, I want to see if your step 2 is also the same as the one he described.

>>17820764
Agreed.

>>17820002 (OP)
Apparently part of the problem was that in the Weimar years there was large immigration of Jews from Eastern Europe (Russia, Poland) into Germany. They were badly behaved and really culturally alien, and even the settled city Jews already living in Germany didn't really want to associate with them

>>17820002 (OP)
Because most of the book is him shitting on the Hapsburg Empire and the Slavs. What I find funniest about this book is that he had been writing stuff like "Gas The Kikes" since the early 20s.

>"If at the beginning of the war and during the war twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain." Mein Kampf page 766, Stalag Edition, Ostara Publications

>>17820807
>shitting on the Hapsburg Empire and the Slavs
You got the first right but whiffed the second.

>>17820813
Hitler's hatred of the Slavs in Mein Kampf was more resentment/envy than a sense of superiority from the fact that he was a homeless outcast in the Austro-Hungarian Empire which favored the Slavs (which he said were a people who could not govern themselves and were therefore controlled by Germans, Jews or other foreigners like Georgians as Stalin) over ethnic Germans like himself.

The opening chapters of Mein Kampf are dedicated to Hitler shitting on Austria-Hungary for being a multicultural empire that he evited to do military service because this not only stood in the way of Greater German unification, but also increasingly favored its various subject peoples over the Germans/Austrians that had built the empire. Habsburg was to blame for Czechs, Slovenes and other Slavs even developing a consciousness as separate nations rather than parts of the German nation.

Thats why also Hitler left Austria in fact he was from a region of Austria that really considered themselves heavily German and his time in Vienna showed him what was planned for the whole German "volk". Hell some of the shit that was going on in Vienna was the beginnings of what would become the infamous "Weimar Degeneracy".

Vienna was a hotbed of Jewish thought at the time. The Habsburgs and Austrian nobility were and are complicit for their own reasons. Hitler thinking the Habsburgs didn't fare much better than the Jews when he came to Austria. The Nazis appropriated all their possessions back to the German people. They fled with the wealthy Vienna Jews to the US, where they lobbied the Roosevelt administration heavily to re-institute the Habsburg monarchy after the war. When that failed, they re-grouped, funded university positions for themselves and sympathetic Jews especially at Chicago through philanthropies like the William Volker Fund, and set forth to design a way back into power.

>>17820833
That came to fruition a couple years later in 1947 when they met at Mont Perelin Switzerland and cooked up the idea for the Nobel Prize in Economics. They had banking friends at the Bank of England and Swedish Riksbank who funded it. Then they awarded prizes to themselves. Austrian Economics/Libertarianism was born. The project has been wildly successful.

Franco eventually offered to reinstate the monarchy and give Otto Von Habsburg the throne of Spain in 1974. But that wasn't enough for them. They still want their throne back in Vienna. And they still want their multicultural world government, only using MENAs instead of Slavs. Just like old Austria Hungary. A diverse set of people from all different nations with different languages under one ruler.

Otto Hapsburg fully endorses Kalergi (The Coudenhove-Kalergi family descends from the Byzantine Phokas family which itself descends from the Roman patrician Fabia family). Picrel is he reading Kalergi's political manifesto of the Paneuropean union the sister publication to the philosophical manifesto: Practical Idealism. Keep in mind his son, Karl, who married into the Thyssen family which tried to control Hitler through finance, is also a Paneuropeanist.

>>17820793
It was literally just some random journalist at the Daily Express who put that headline you monkey brain moron.
And now you guys parade sensationalistic journalism like its the ultimate source (which you otherwise never would do and probably frown on normies who do).

>>17820798
Stormfags found a sensationalist headline that confirms their narrative and now suddenly the media is based and the utlimate source.

They really are dumb as normies, but they are on the other side of the coin.

>>17820877
>jews declare war on Germans
>get btfo
>anon thinks this is unheard of in world history

Bud that's their whole supposed history as told by themselves.

>>17820833
>Hitler's hatred of the Slavs in Mein Kampf
He says explicitly that Slavs aren't a race.

>>17820900
How about you actually read the fucking book beyond /pol/tard screenshots you don't understand the context of?

>>17820813
>>17820900
The NS leadership (Hitler and Himmler) classified Slavs into roughly four categories
>Slavicized Aryans- this includes Croats, Slovenians, some Czechs, and a small number of token Slavs from other countries
>South Slavs- this includes Bulgarians and Serbs. The NS weren't particularly interested in them one way or the other.
>Czechs- for the most part considered non-Aryan, but treated better than East Slavs
>East Slavs- Includes the various Soviet ethnicities plus Poland. Referred to as Untermensch (Underhumanity) and believed to be a slave race subservient to International Jewry

>>17820896
Except jews never "declared war" on Germany.
One journalist at one newspaper used that paraphrasing as a sensationalist headline for his article about how a certain jewish lobby group wanted to boycott German goods.
Sensationalist headlines are typically used to capture the interest of the reader. That's literally what the media does. To use it as a source is so dumb its unbelieve able.

The equivalent would be a journalist in 2025 at the Washington Post putting the headline "Arabia declares war on USA" because Arab diaspora across the world is currently boycotting many American companies that has shown support to Israel.
And then Zionist extremists use this headline as a "source" to prove that USA is at war.

The problem is that you, and every other stormnigger, dont understand how stupid this is. You're simply too far gone to be reasoned with, so you're going to keep believing that "judea declares war on Germany" was an actual thing.

>>17820939
Jews are always at war with the goyim anyway. I am not aware of any other cult with religious days devoted to resentment.

>>17820949
Is that why thousands of jews died for Germany in ww1 in the non-jewish cause of Germany becoming the leading power in Europe?

It's almost as if they identified themselves more as Germans than as jews.

>>17820962
Jews were divided over WW1, some of them initially supported the Kaiser because they wanted to overthrow the Romanovs. After this was accomplished in 1917, they switched sides and became massive supporters of the Entente (this is why America joined the war at the same time). Many of the Jews who had initially fought for Germany then became the loudest advocates of overthrowing the Kaiser and giving in to French demands (which effectively involved turning Germany into a French vassal).

>>17820962
mostly half-jews
and life is choices and bets. the mongrels didn't have much choice and just bet wrongly

>>17820939
>jews didn't hate Germans

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!

We've all read the Talmud bud. It's too late.

>>17820978
Overall, Jews were pro-French pro-America and only pro-Germany insofar as they were anti-Romanov. They were also contradictory with regard to Britain as they supported Britain up to the end of WW1 (particularly with taking Palestine from the Ottomans) but then began championing anti-imperialist rhetoric in the 1920s.
You can never really trust Jews because they switch sides at the drop of a hat

>>17820002 (OP)
I don't want to hear any more circumcised opinions.

It is that simple.

>>17820978
>>17820992
>You can never really trust Jews because they switch sides at the drop of a hat

I'm more inclined not to trust /pol/fags who pretend that jews are a hivemind playing 4D chess becuse it's the only half-insane explaination to a reality they cannot fathom, which is that jews are just people as their own individual.

>>17820764
>pregnant Sophie Turner

VGH....

>>17821023
Circumcised language patterns. More circumspeak in my space.

>>17821041
>Everyone who disagree with me is a jew

What causes this?

>>17821046
Circumcised deflection and sophist rhetoric pattern. No more circumspeak in my space. Circumcised are banned.

>>17820793
>It's referencing people who describe themselves as such
Nigga nobody ever referred to themselves as "Judea". Not even the actual budding israeli state that already existed at the time.

>>17821046
See:
>>17821184

>>17820002 (OP)
By debunking it in American press

>>17820931
No, it didn't. Slavs were categorized as Aryan in the subgroups 'Baltic, Dinaric, Eastern'. The people that were of mixed ancestry were considered subhuman, not regular white Russians.

>>17821543
The NS leadership didn't consider any Russians to be white, save for those with German ancestry.
To them terms like white, Aryan, Germanic, and Nordic are all used interchangeably

>>17820962
Jews identify as jews.
They werent and they did not considered themselves german
They were barely israelites that lived in germany.
Off with your retarded lies

>>17821549
>The NS leadership didn't consider any Russians to be white, save for those with German ancestry.
Show me the law in which Russians are not considered white.
>To them terms like white, Aryan, Germanic, and Nordic are all used interchangeably
This is a complex issue. They considered anyone 'white' Aryan and whose ancestry to be Germanic. From ancient Greece to Russia to Britain. They considered all of these civilizations to be 'Germanic' anf founded by Germanics. It's akin to modern Europeans considering Yamnaya to be their starting point.. Anyway to them East Russians (asiatic kinds) were not European, they were asiatic mystery meats, but regular white Russians were considered 'germanic' and Aryan. Now I myself think this is entirely retarded, but there was a lot of we wuz autism going in Nazi circles.

>>17820660
He's super-mad that the Jews are stopping him from touching the strong, manly bodies of the working class male.

>>17820813
Don't make me repost the quotes.

He literally says, in the book, that the only thing good about the Slavs are the lands the hold and that those lands are worthless until the Slavs have been removed and the soil been put under German control. Which he plans to do.
He then adds that integration is the worst idea and that he'd rather see a Slav dead than suffer him to speak German even in places where only bears shit.

>>17820984
You've read the Talmud? All of it?

>>17820002 (OP)
They didn't like it

>>17820931
>East Slavs- Includes the various Soviet ethnicities plus Poland. Referred to as Untermensch (Underhumanity) and believed to be a slave race subservient to International Jewry

The funny thing is that the Nazis believed that Jewish power in Eastern Europe was the result of Soviets, when in fact it already existed since the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth because their nobility followed an ideology called Sarmatism,. Basically they claimed they were descendants of Sarmatians/Avars that conquered these lands in the but adopted local Slavic languages in place of the Iranian. Yeah, this is Proto-Aryanism even though Poles are the people with the most R1a in Europe. Thus polish noblemen felt no common bonds with a peasant, but they were very open into accepting Lithuanias, Ruthenians, Germans and Hungarian into the nobility ranks and Jews as their proxy scapegoat multi-generational class.

Being the nation with the most nobles per capita in Europe (8-10%, 16% in some regions), just for comparison, Poland had 35 peasants for each noble, while Russia had 200 peasants for a single fucking noble (This shit was more decentralized than the Holy Roman Empire), the nobles could have private armies that could go against the king and invade other European nations, which made the PLC an anarchic buffer state that was partitioned twice by its less decentralized neighbors and tried desperately to make a more centralized/stable government too late for the third partition in 1795.

The Ashkenazim have genetic origins in an Judaean diaspora population in Southern Italy during the Roman Empire intermarried with varying amounts of European women. Toward the collapse of the Roman Empire, they began migrating northward toward the Rhineland, and when the HRE grew, it invited many of the Jews of their new territories to settle in the Rhineland. And began migrating eastward at the end of the High Middle Ages with invitations from what would become the PLC.

>>17821828
Constantine the Great punished conversion to Judaism with death, illegalized Jewish/Christian intermarriage and forbade Jews from owning Christian slaves. Jews had some legal privileges (in exchange for a silver tax) which stemmed from the time of Caesar and the second diaspora created by Nero and Titus, but Constantine II and Constans revoked any remaining Jewish privilegia. Justinian the Great crushed a huge Samaritan (Jewish) revolt in Palestine.

And yes, Usury was completely illegal in the Middle Ages WITHIN YOUR FAITH. The Old Testament forbids both to Jews and Christians to lend Usury to adherents of their own faith, but not for others. Jews would lend to Christians, BUT Lombard bankers did the same to Jews in turn. Imagine that, your ancestors actually figured out how to Jew the Jews!

In addition, Jewish profits were meaningless, first because they had no way to enforce payment (and trying to would cause a pogrom), and second, they were forbidden from participating in trade or merchant leagues, joining crafts or guilds, inheriting titles or owning land and completely banned from Church lands (1/3rds of agricultural production at the time), thus rendering it absolutely useless.

The Lombard banks on the other hand could finance investments through loans on collateral, had a monopoly on pawnbrokering and currency exchange. Thus whenever Jews loaned with interest, they lost the value to the Christian trade monopoly. In addition, the Jews were heavily taxed (for their financial actions). It was called "Fiscus Judaica", and the Church continued doing it. Not to forget, Jews couldn't hide, being forced to wear hat&star as marks.

>>17821838
At the start of wars, Jews were asked to pay. Afterwards, they were kicked out the cities, property seized, tax-collection ended. Jews were an underclass like Gypsies, only meant to do dirtywork considered too impure for Christians.

Most Jews in America come from what was the PLC, which had the largest Jewish population of world before WW2. Unlike the rest of Europe, they lived like a protected and privileged class in the Commonwealth, under the Statut Kaliski and later royal confirmations. They had all kinds of legal privileges and controlled key sectors of the economy for the szlachta burocratic absentee landlords. Jews were arendatorzy, tax collectors, leaseholders of entire estates, salt mines, mills, and distilleries. They had near monopolies on money lending, liquor production, and tavern keeping. Basically, they had a license to fleece the peasants. The PLC peasant borrowed from the Jew to sow the crop, paid a rent share to the noble and another to the arendator, handed over grain for distilling, saw the surplus exported or taxed, and borrowed again to drink what was left in the Jew’s tavern. The whole countryside was up to its eyes in debt to the kahal’s agents. This was considered the highest point of Jewish history in Europe, the Paradisus Judaeorum. The wealth from this system funded countless yeshivot, and most important modern era Jewish religious movements, the Frankism and Hasidism, trace their roots to PLC in the 1600s.