why were boomers so addicted to killing people?

>>17821098 (OP)
Killing people is good. Too many young people causes spikes in crime. Too many old people puts a strain on the labor pool.

>>17821098 (OP)
>why were boomers so addicted to killing people?

I'm under the impression it was half a dozen things:
1. The surveillance state wasn't what it is today: DNA forensic evidence wasn't first used until like 1984 for instance. It was just infinitely easier to be a grassroots psychopath. It was also a lot easier for a town, a small town, to be an evangelical cult nightmare where the police let rapes and murders happen because "outsiders need to stay outta our town" or whatever.
2. They were exposed to significantly higher lead levels since they put it in the paint and the gasoline. Lead makes you dumb and violent.
3. Entertainment options were limited: no internet, no internet porn, no streaming services, no video games. People are retarded and anachronistic in that disenfranchised single men in the past would, in the absence of video games, cause crime. Say what you will, but constant access to internet porn and video games keeps retarded violent men placated.
4. Racial relations were a lot more heated and energetic: black panthers, kkk'ers, martin luther kinging, millions mans march, etc.. I say this more as a conflating thing: people in the past don't have the distractions they have today, they had significantly longer media news cycles, so they could really seethe and fester about societal problems.
Likewise, you could just rape or murder gay people with impunity. I can't remember the term for the legal defense, homosexual hysteria? transexual hysteria? There was a legal defense that you could say a gay person was so offensive to you that you went into a hysteric fit and killed them and the court would just be like, "sounds about right." This is, of course, bad because the onus was on the dead/attacked person to "prove they're not gay."

17821127
two posts and the ChatGPT spambots are already at work

>>17821098 (OP)

The direct result of LBJ's "Great Society", Leftists once again ruining a society.

>>17821137
retard sees a post longer than 50 words and assumes its gpt

>>17821137
Doesn't read anything like AI retard and AI wouldn't make errors like misuse of the term "anachronistic" as anon did.

>>17821127
I think these definitely helped, but the ultimate source of the problem that caused it to go over the tipping point into a self-feeding cascade was the death of the American city and community. With everyone moving across the country and into spread out suburbs people were now surrounded by total strangers from completely different parts of the country. When no one knows anyone it's a lot easier to "hide in the crowd" and theres a lot less psychological barriers to committing crime against someone you have no connection or bond with than against someone you've known your whole life (and again a lot easier to not be recognized and caught). Add to this that the move to suburbia gutted the cities abilities to economically sustain themselves, leading to a collapse in city services which led to increased crime which simply caused even more people to leave the cities. The crime rate plummeting in the 1990's was less because of any specific policy than it was those factors finally burning themselves out.

>Secular explanation
>They were exposed to substantial amounts of lead during their time that have neurological complications mainly lowering empathy and increasing sociopathic behavior

>/x/ reason
>the demonic realm inserted themselves into this spoiled generation to enjoy worldly pleasures and to hurt as many people possible. boomers are demons in skinsuits

Unironically black people. Not even trying to be racist. We put millions of them in jail which put somewhat of a stop to it.