>>17824289 (OP) A Form is not a physical object, but rather an ideal version or essence of that object. For example, the Form of a Tree is not any particular tree we see in the world, but the perfect concept of "treeness"—the ideal, unchanging essence of what it means to be a tree.
>>17824293 Either AI/Bot or some kid doing his homework
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 4:03:16 AM No.17824300
>>17824289 (OP) >"I want to make threads on Plato, a man who emphasized the need for thinking for oneself, and Jesus, a man who emphasized the importance of coming to faith in one's beliefs for oneself." >"But I don't want any discussion in my threads." >"Also, I'm just gonna ask AI what it thinks about em." >"Thinking sure is hard work. For the AI. Leaves me lots of time to browse /gif/."
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:31:24 AM No.17824764
>>17824289 (OP) physical objects will approximate the "forms" because the physical objects will never be "pure" representations of a form but a fleeting result. It is the same as kings and warriors fulfilling the "forms" of the gods by being far better fullfillments of them than the average individual. forms are conceptual "perfections" whereas physical states are fallible blobs of change.