Well?

They'd sway America to their way of thinking and show Ho Chi Minh what imperialism really means.

>>17825497 (OP)
The British empire or British people? British people did fight the war. MacNamaras morons were notoriously just the average Angolem ogre.

>>17825497 (OP)
They could never dream of pulling off the carrier operations the US navy did
So probably very embarrassing

only faggots watch this channel

>>17825890
USA literally lost lol

>>17826232
ur uncle's arm is mangled by agent orange you fucking gook

>>17825497 (OP)
>What if the British fought the Vietnam war
Already have. Done and dusted in 6 months, back in home for teatime.

>>17826337
This post was made by someone who reads Wikipedia infoboxes instead of books.

>>17826236
>we killed innocent civilians so…uh…we won!
Gook is a slur for Koreans btw mutt

>>17826337
Kek, British took decades to end an insurgency back home, in Ireland

>>17826232
Not a military loss though

>>17826701
It's funny how the British Empire's combat abilities are most clear in cases where all of the major colonies/commonwealth countries are involved (like WWI or the Malayan Crisis), but as soon as Britain is left to defend itself (as in the case of The Troubles or the Falklands War), the UK fails to curbstomp its enemy.

>>17826402
you all look the same regardless.

>>17826716
Retard the UK literally curbstomped argentina

>>17826722
Look at the K:D ratio. Too low to be a curbstomp.

>>17826232
The USA literally arranged a signed peace agreement. NV violated it a year later. Why do retards keep talking about things they know nothing about?

>>17825497 (OP)
>simply history
go back

>>17826735
If you make a peace agreement as an excuse to get out of here but fail to enforce it, that's still a defeat

>>17826832
still more well informed than the average /his/tard

>Britain sends a small force of generals and soldiers with experience from Malaya, to advice the Americas as to how they defeated the communist insurgency there and how these methods can be carried out in vietnam
>America ignores all advice, like they did with the French
Nothing changes

>>17826232
3.1 million dead gooks say otherwise. The war ended, America contained communism and we promised to continue to support South Vietnam, but the democRATS betrayed them. No military losses.

>>17826840
It was because of the DemocRATS. It wasn’t a military rout and we never promised to send more troops only support.

>>17826174
/thread

and im sick of these infographic-y or visually well presented (but looks ugly somehow) shitty ass channels that try to sound factually flawless

>>17827325
>doesn't count because the people in power were from the team I don't like

>>17826716
>the UK fails to curbstomp its enemy
>Falklands War
They curbstomped the Argies from the other side of the world
>but muh militia with hunting rifles lost
Kys

>>17827321
>America contained communism
Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos say otherwise

>>17826713
Militarily speaking, north Vietnam won by militarily conquering Sourh Vietnam, wgich the US was there to prevent.

>>17829056
>wgich the US was there to prevent.
Nope, the US military was already gone when Saigon fell, the only Americans left were CIA unironically. Militarily the US military clearly had the advantage and the higher K:D ratio, the loss of Vietnam had nothing to do with the military