Are there examples cross-culturally or historically where pedophilia was actually viewed as morally acceptable (not just ignored or tolerated), or is it universally abhorred? For example, was Mohammed marrying a nine year old viewed as acceptable during his time, or was it just tolerated because he was a warlord who would have beheaded you had you objected to it?

>>17828765 (OP)
Every man born before the 20th century would be considered a "pedophile" today.

>>17828776
Yes, but I mean actual pedophilia, like what Mohammad engaged in.

>>17828776
>>17828814
You retards always confuse Pedophillia for Hebephillia, they're not the same thing.

>>17828765 (OP)
Most Americans are fine with it as long as the perpetrator is female.

>>17828824
someone check this nigga's phone gallery

>>17829038
i love 13 year old girls

>>17828765 (OP)
Pedophilia was and remains acceptable from the point of view of pisslam. There is functionally no difference between pisslam and satanism. It's just pure undiluted evil.

>>17828824
Fuck off with ur semantics. Yeah fucking a 10 year old and 15 year old isnt the same, but if you're a grown ass man you're shouldn't be fucking either

>>17828814
If Muhammad was a pedophile why was his first wife like 10 years older than him and none of his other wives that young? Wouldn’t it make sense that if he were. Pedophile he’d have a harem of little girls?

>>17829760
Didn’t Thomas Aquinas say it’s okay to marry at the age of 7? At least be consistent in your logic.

Americans only pretend to hate pedophilia in reality they are salivating degenerates who make countdown clocks for underage actress for when they turn 18 and will make two lolita film adaptations with a hot teenager for each one of them

Degenerate prudes the lot of them

>>17830292
Why would you have a harem of women who all look the same? Kinda defeats the purpose

>>17830319
You get the point, if the man was supposedly sexually attracted to children, why isn’t there a consistent example of this? Why didn’t he toss her to the side for a new younger wife when she reached 18? Or even add on a new child wife at some later point when she was older?

>fuck only one goat
>known as a goatfucker forever
Not fair!

>>17828765 (OP)
There are tons of examples, most cultures historically saw no issue with. The political tradlarpers and the pedophilia shriekers from america like to lie about that and they pretend that most people in the past were not only moral, but shared their morality. But the reality is much different. In the american 19th century they had tons and tons of child brothels.

The real question quickly becomes “why did cultural mores change so strikingly on this subject?”

>>17830318
It seems like such a schizophrenic country. My post here>>17830362 is GARUNTEED to get mutts spamming calling me a pedo. Just for questioning their historicap claims. They are obsessed with the topic but also seem like you said they whore out girls the day they turn 18 and they have countdown clocks. It’s weird right?

Mthen when you realize that America was the principal force for banning pedophilia in other countries in thenlast generation, it makes you wonder WTF? Why do culturally obsessed with it to the point of waging war around the glpbe opver it

>>17830300
Americans will never have a straight discussion about this subject for some reason. They have a party line and everything. You’re nornallowed to say that chrostians were pedos or else you’re a pedo. You’re not allowed to say muzzies werent pedos or else you’re a pedo. See there is a staunch party line. It’s political but i cant fogure it out.

>>17830235
It’s not semantics, it’s describing two very different things. Both are wrong but for different reasons. Why do you want me to mentally associate “raping kids” with “manipulating young women”? Two completely different things yet you want me to think they’re the same thing just because they’re both wrong.