1 hour ago №1637482[Quote] [Voice Chat]
The biblical accounts in 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles regarding David's census differ primarily in their attribution of the census's instigation and in the specific numbers reported. 2 Samuel 24 attributes the census to God, while 1 Chronicles 21 attributes it to Satan tempting David

>>17829185 (OP)
Hail Satan

Sacred Scripture is inerrant. Apparent contradictions, such as those in 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 regarding David's census, are reconcilable through careful exegesis, considering divine inspiration, historical context, and theological intent. Both accounts are true, with differences reflecting distinct emphases in God's revelation.

>>17831151
trust the plan

>>17831151
>Scripture is inerrant -ACK

>>17831298
Yes.

>>17831309
Exegesis resolves apparent discrepancies by recognizing complementary perspectives under divine inspiration.

>>17831309
Copyrighting errors can still happen.

All manuscripts of 2 Kings agree it’s 22. The ancient Syriac and Arabic manuscripts of 2 Chronicles state it’s 22. A few ancient Hebrew manuscripts say 42. So it’s 22, and some scribes made a mistake.

>>17829185 (OP)
I love how the story in 2 Samuel opens
>Again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel
No context or explanation given. Just "Yahweh was pissed off again." As usual.

>>17831390
>scribal error existing for millenia
>error is present in KJV

Flawed human made fairytales

>>17831356
>Exegesis resolves apparent discrepancies by inventing explanations that are not apparent in the text. Kind of like a nerd reconciling Star Trek episodes with contradicting lore.
Fixed it for you.