I would say that I'm far right, who would be the most acceptable for me? Stalin? Mao? Tito?

Bump

>>17829737 (OP)
Pol Pot. read about his main points of contention and you'll figure out why.

>>17829737 (OP)
Stalin.

>>17829737 (OP)
my response is that I think you are terminally online and you've been mind raped by the internet and you should probably take a break from it.

>>17829765
My response is that you are a condescending little fag and you've been sucking cock so much and you should probably take a break from it.

>>17829737 (OP)
Deng

>>17829737 (OP)
Mao because East Asian interests aren't necessarily at odds with the West. Plus he befriended Nixon
You cannot be pro-West and pro-Stalin. It's an obvious contradiction

>>17829737 (OP)
Maybe Wilhelm Pieck or Josef Tito becuase they left very small firms alone (Tito permitted private farms so I like him better than Pieck).

I like that Stalin affirmed the importance of family and pronatalism, and put the doctors in their place. Doctors are too uppity in Britain. Academics more generally have too much influence on state policy. The doctors demand we debase our currency to pay for the NHS and then complain that the debasement affects their salary.

>>17829737 (OP)
Everyone on the far left field like Mao or Stalin.

>far right

Only one communist country makes the entire judeowest seethe - which is Xi's China

Castro or Tito
Since they didnt go into genocide territory with insane dogma but still kept their country degenerate free while not sacrificing their nations identity and history in the name of goymmunism.

>>17831212
China is National Socialist.
Just replace the aryanism and volksgemeinschaft with Han exceptionalism and "The Chinese Dream"

>>17829748
why dont you just tell us

>>17831212
>>17831219
based retard take

>>17829737 (OP)
Pretty sure most would choose Tito

>>17829737 (OP)

>>17831219
This.

>>17833006
Bunkermaxing

>>17829737 (OP)
If you ignore him helping African commies, giving better women rights and trying to give more rights to racial minorities, Castro was kinda a chud

>Grew up being influenced by Falangism, leading him to slightly praise Spain's role in Cuba
>Oppressed queers (though admittedly calmed down on that later in life)
>Allowed the church to go about their activities for the most part
>Kicked out Anarchists (Common happening among leftists, but still counts)
>Respected Francisco Franco so much that when he died, he ordered 3 days of mourning (Something which did not happen for Mao the next year)
>When he visited Spain for the first time, he hanged out with Manuel Fraga, a noted Francoist
>Praised Margaret Thatcher
>Praised Gorbachev for the reforms
>Opposed Pinochet's arrest

>>17833704
>Respected Francisco Franco so much that when he died, he ordered 3 days of mourning (Something which did not happen for Mao the next year)

Damn I didn't know this

>>17832640
>t. Person who gets his info from YouTube channels that say China will collapse in 2 weeks

>>17833704
Why on earth would Castro have liked Thatcher or Pinochet?

>>17829737 (OP)
The Jong-Un Dynasty of North Korea. Pretty much a nazbol absolute monarchy

Jucheism and thus the Kims. Juche is and has from the beginning been more of an ideological continuation of Japanese Imperialist ideology than of Communism, once you remove the unpleasant terminology the society is clearly a RW wet dream.

>Totally and earnestly hierarchal
>Ultranationalist
>Extreme Isolationist
>Brutally and actively anti-subversion
>Hyper-Religious (they pretend this is not the case which makes it cooler)
>Obsessed with purity and cleanliness in an environmental, ethnic, racial and linguistic sense
>Hate consumerism
>Beat foreigners to death for littering/vandalism
>Totally contemptuous of social progress
>Don't care about economics except as an instrument of the will of the Nation

They're what most /pol/ types basically wish the Right in the West was.

>>17834836
For Thatcher, it was mostly to cozy up to the west and respecting women™. For Pinochet it was mostly to keep South America stable
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1998/11/cas-n05.html

>>17834877
Best Korea for a reason

>>17829737 (OP)
Stalin literally had frienship pacts with nazis before Barbarossa happened, so him. He made soviet union from multicultural socialist state into nationalist-socialist one, where being Russian was the elite class, and rest were serfs to be used and assimilated.

>>17829737 (OP)
Obama

>>17829737 (OP)
>keep calm

>>17834877
>>Beat foreigners to death for littering/vandalism
Thank you, Radio Free Asia, very cool!

>>17833704
>>Respected Francisco Franco so much that when he died, he ordered 3 days of mourning (Something which did not happen for Mao the next year)
Which side was Cuba on in the Sino-Soviet split?

>>17829737 (OP)
i dislike all of them, since they ruled according to a talmudic ideology of killing the goyim with a ruling class of jews, but if i were to choose one it'd be tito.