>>17830210 (OP)>Is meat eating an evolutionary mystery?The other Anons have said it as much, but there's no great mystery to meat: the literal moment it became available, our species obsessed over it, and that obsession predates even the Homo Erectus (the first arguably 'man ape') as seen in Chimpanzees:
>>17830813 >>17830238 Meat maybe isn't 'technically' easier to digest than vegetation, what would be more correct to say is meat has more immediately available resource: fat, protein, vitamins, when you're eating liver or muscle tissue you get immediate access to sustenance. When you eat plant fiber, tubers, fruit, you're usually working through a lot of empty calories, water, inedible cellulose, etc. Fat and protein in particular are EXTREMELY important because of their relative scarcity and the fact that the human brain makes constant demands on your body of those two components (plus sugar).
For all the omnivore/herbivore/carnivore debate, the rut is humans are evolved to deliberately cook their food.
We don't have massive incisors or cutting teeth, our gut is too small to ferment vegetation, our gut is too long to get the most out of meat, our stomach acid isn't strong enough to kill intestinal parasites, we're a mess of incongruent intestinal details that don't make sense unless you cook your food. Which we do. *We need to.
*Except for fish. You can technically live off of raw fish (so long as you eat most of the fish: bones, organs, eyes, head). You'd be ugly desperate for carbohydrates, but you'd live.