Ridiculous thread of lies

>>17832399
I can justify every one

>>17832464
This one is less certain imo

>>17832374
Bisexual desu.

>>17832480
A bunch of the guys I posted were bi actually

>>17832447
>two bros
>slaying
Yasss.

Nearly everyone posted in this thread was bi, but mostly just fucked women, except for Lawrence and Rohm they were both 100% gay.

>>17832407
>STELLA!!!
based

>>17832366 (OP)
Parmenides and Zeno (invented monotheism essentially).

Radbod. Pagancuck "king" who refused the light of Christ and got what he deserved.

>>17832555
Source?

>>17832413
And yet you haven't

Walt Whitman and Peter Doyle

>>17832593
Plato's Parmenides

>Yes, in his dialogue Parmenides, Plato suggests a previous romantic or sexual relationship between the philosopher Parmenides and Zeno of Elea.
More specifically, Plato, through the character of Socrates, hints at a past romantic or sexual involvement between the younger Zeno and Parmenides, who was Zeno's teacher. While this is a depiction within a philosophical dialogue and its accuracy to historical reality isn't entirely confirmed, it is generally accepted that it reflects at least some truth about their relationship.

>>17832366 (OP)
it's you, OP.

>>17832482
>>17832511
Sexuality is a product of science popularization. An historical curiosity. Most people consider a lifestyle of exclusive M4M sex to be deeply flawed, even gays themselves feel sorry about 'disappointing ancestors' and wasting human potential. Lesbians are so vulnerable to this, I won't even harp on them. There's no equivalency between gay and straight, which is why zest was originally classified as a disease when the first pseudosciences hit. There's no inherent human identity related to fetishes or physical associations, there is no 'sexuality.'

Sex feels like self-discovery because the world and history are so much greater than self. On one end of the spectrum you have yourself, gaysexual "ase" virgin who's afraid of being touched. On the other end you have Oscar Wilde, genius, beloved artist, gourmet of life. Actually 10 million Oscar Wildes. Experiencing the touch of another person, learning the language of intimacy is always going to feel like great truth for your end, because it connects you to the genius of humanity. Gays have the same experience going straight, which is why most have sex with women at some point and many are OCD or incels. There are plenty of reasons to choose your sexual type and stop experimenting, but none of them involve a deep biological or psychic imperative. It's a myth.

>>17832800
Based post

>>17832366 (OP)
>homos
>dont have 100+ partners
Yeah Im thinking these arent actual homos.
the homos we see today are mentally ill rape victims who think they can liberate their soul through sex.
totally unlike the overwhelmingly chaste and virtuous by comparison men of the past.

>>17832387
based Epaminondas poster
>>17832560
without googling I'm going to guess that isn't a real person

>>17832800
>>17832915
writing a bunch of bs isn't based

>>17833052
>overwhelmingly chaste and virtuous by comparison men of the past
This post reads like parody.

>>17833698
>th-those are just words
holy cope

>>17833708
According to the data we have no, homosexuals have a lifetime partner count ranging from 1000-3000

You are welcome to post data concerning Frederick the Great, Alexander, or anyone else from the past whom you think is a homosexual having 1000+ partners.

otherwise, you're just wrong and based on the evidence we have, none of the men in this thread were homosexuals.

>>17833695

That is a real person. He's also known as Redbad.

>>17832482

Theyre actually all straight as long as they only topped, only sissy bottoms are gay

>>17832366 (OP)

Odin. Drank semen from hanged corpses.

>>17833833
>>17833829
fuck right off simon samefagging salva

>>17833698
Hey guys, I found a picture of OP's education

>>17832800
>>17832915
>>17833698
>but Gigachad, I kissed a girl and I didn't liked it! You can't explain that.
That's the easiest part to explain. You love men and have no incentive to change anything. Even if you did get a wife, why not eventually relapse? You love men! Living in a society that denies the greatness of men is not a problem with your brain. People need to understand the myth of gay=bad is over, men also carry the ultimate mystery that melts inquiring minds and reshapes assumptions. You can spend a lifetime obsessing over men, plenty of people do and that's valid.

Moreover, it makes no sense to unsee a powerful sight or unlearn the truth. Once you discover greatness, it stays discovered. That's how people get gay and stay gay, it's an accepted life path with real rewards. So if you're one of these self-hating gays who totally "would change if I could bro" the only way out is through. You have to unlock the deepest art of loving and sexing women to compete with something already established, and it would take repitition. You're only human. Gay determinism isn't real though

>>17832366 (OP)

>>17832374
To be honest, Alexander seemed to be the type of fella that gets an erection on the battlefield slaying his enemies rather than in bed

Look at him, look at his pose, his face, his clothes.
This fruity motherfucker never married.

>>17832387
I know that Epaminondas was a fag without question, but was Pelopidas also one?

>>17834900
>he did it because he was mad jelly that the jews got to touch all the manly, sweaty aryan workers
It's in Mein Kampf.

>>17834900
What did Hitler mean by this?

>>17832399

>>17834994
For including the word "Odic" he couldn't really have been any clearer.

>>17832378
He was just straight up asexual, not gay.

>>17835750
Nigga was empathic about how watching deliciously brown teenage boys jack each other off was the best day of his life.

>>17832371
>>17832366 (OP)
>>17832374
Not gay

>>17835001
meds

>>17832366 (OP)
Why are homos so based?

>>17832399
Keep coping, straightoid

>>17835980
Mishima literally was part of the gay scene.

My favourite gay nonce

>>17834488
Sounds like your mom let you down, or maybe not enough so you didn't develop a complex over women

I read somewhere da Vinci and Michelangelo were probably gay but never confirmed. How true is that?

>>17838410
Da Vinci had several young boy proteges whom he used as his models (including in one sketch of Salai where an erect penis is drawn) and was anonymously accused of sodomy, though never charged. There are also some texts from the era poking fun at his alleged homosexuality. Michelangelo had deep emotional attachments to both men and women. Notably he became enamoured of a much younger man while in his middle age and wrote many ardent poems to him. This wasn't considered unseemly by his contemporaries, but after his death his nephew changed the sexual pronouns of the addressee in his poems from male to female. His art also focuses primarily on the beauty of the male form and sometimes when he sculpts women it seems like he just sculpts a man and then (very poorly) adds breasts - pic related. I would say Michelangelo, whatever his orientation, was nevertheless a chaste and very devout orthodox Catholic. People often say that the love poems written by Shakespeare and Michelangelo for other men are conventional for the time they lived in, but I've read a scholarly article that says this is kind of a baseless claim. They are actually unique.

It's impossible to know anything for certain, and there are definite cultural ambiguities that we must be aware of. Nevertheless I think the speculation is relatively reasonable. There are certainly cases where I think modern people misinterpret stuff that was ordinary for the day, like with Abraham Lincoln.

>>17838400
that was a late night post. The gist of it is, humanity and history are so much greater than the individual, inexperienced baseline, that any path you choose "leads to greatness" and truth. Finding something greater than yourself doesn't mean you have to bow, it means you're waking up. The question with a most gay people is, quite frankly, why do you hate women? Not why do you love men. Trauma and bad experiences are invalidated by the idea that anyone who hates women must have been born that way.

>>17832399
True. They were all roommates

>>17832366 (OP)

>>17838430
the negative connotation of e.g. holding hands with men isn't inherent to humanity, it took trial and error to establish. Outdated sexual ethics were simply earlier in the trial and error process, there's no mechanism by which they could've known homosexuality would lead to bad things before it did.

On porn sites a lot of times you'll see user galleries named "X lookalike" with guys hunting for porn chicks that look just like their ex. I know because I used to do the same thing. What a simultaneously lucky and unlucky thing, to get sex with the exact person (down to very minor facial features) you were inherently genetically always born to be attracted to -- then to lose them. Sexuality is funny that way. Or . . . could having sex with her dozens of times have an effect on ME?

>>17838430
Salute anon

>>17832464
what? even ignoring the fact that him being a bottom was political slander from his enemies his affair with Cleopatra is one of the most famous love affairs ever, and that's not even mentioned yet how he slept with he wives of half the senate
he was at the very least bi

>>17838430
Thanks for keeping effortposting alive

>>17837647
It didn't happen.
They deserved it.
It should happen again. (MJ's whole career)

>>17832374
>known relationships with women
>no known relationships with men
>b-b-but he totally was in love with his friend he was just hiding it for literally no reason

>>17839572
Aristotle was in that scrumptious boy arse

>>17832366 (OP)
that image deserves a 'son
HWABAG

>>17832366 (OP)
lit the most cobbable pic ive ever seen HWABAG

>>17832366 (OP)

>>17838434
People fuck women because they hate them there no making sense out of this human thing your trying to dig yourself out of

>>17840245
That makes literally no sense. Are you a feminist by any chance?

>>17834994
"Odic force" niggas will go to extreme lengths just to find an excuse to stroke their bro's hand. Also, what book did you get that screenshot from?

>>17840644
>Are you a feminist by any chance?
See? You just proved my point

The neurosis that plagues homosexuals are the same if not similar to those of heterosexuals.

>>17832394
not the first gay but certainly the first faggot