https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/113454#
Samples have majority Anatolian Neolithic Farmer admixture with significant WHG and CHG. EHG is almost non existent

Grazianista, Xerej here. I know you might be reading this. I'm sincerely sorry I don't know the reason I did what I did but I'm really sorry some shit went through my minds and I acted without thinking. Please come back even if under a new identity idc but I hate to think that you deleted because of my retardness.

>>17833949
Tags: sicilian, natufian, anatolian, medjeet, shitcilian, greek, roman, iberogermanic, italians, italian, italy

Steppe sisters?? Our answer ??
Another non IE civilization

>>17833941 (OP)
This study is so fucking shit man what is nrken even sharing, that guy shares everything he can find
It's like some graduate thesis, it's full of typos, doesn't even mention north or southern italy once.
Straight up trash

>>17833968
Not bad as the Iranian one

>>17833968
>that guy shares everything he can find
You should Check-out beaker lady, much better and accurate

>>17833983
Wasn't she sharing and advertising her trash here months ago?

>>17833949
I’m done with medjeeting on twitter for a while. I was going to deactivate anyways. It was fun but got obnoxious for me, plus I am busy.

>>17833968
It clearly has Turkish nationalist undertones. Instead of just focusing on the new samples from Anatolia, there is this sotadix brown coded resentment that just regurgitates the 2019 study on Rome with absolutely zero to add.

>we replaced the Romans but we remained the exact same Anatolian kangs

Plus using Boncuklu is a strange choice. It’s another piece of shit graduate thesis that should have been handled by Reich lab instead of a grad student, just like the one on Pompeii. Hopefully the new samples will be published in the next AADR so it’s not a total waste.

>>17834059
The Romans were pic related. East Med admixture is male biased. They were conquerors, not slaves. Cry about it.

>>17834065
What am I crying about? Nothing. There is a clear agenda from the author of this paper. There were no new Italian samples provided but for some reason significant parts of this paper talked about Central Italy for no reason. Literally nothing to add.

Yes R437 is significant but there are not enough samples from this time yet. There is no way Latins were homogeneously like that. I predict a majority were like Etruscans with a sizable minority of R437 like individuals, more than most would expect. You are also anti-Italic and say they were mudhutters and cuckolds.

>>17834097
It's basically saying the same thing as the paper about the Balkans. That there was no significant genetic contribution from 'Italics'. This is because the Romans weren't pure Italics. There's a much stronger correlation between Roman expansion and J2 y-dna than there is with R1b-U152.
>Another possibility is that individuals carrying contributions from the Near East, which began increasing in S Europe during the Iron Age, might have migrated eastward in subsequent generations. As they share high-level similarity into eastern populations, they resulted in less pronounced differences in Anatolia.
>mudhutters
It's true.
>cuckolds
Their Celtic brothers sure were: https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/were-the-celts-matriarchal-ancient-dna-reveals-men-married-into-local-powerful-female-lineages

>>17833968
>>17834059
So how do I know I can trust the studies? Is something being distorted or hidden on purpose? As the other anon said, the Iranian study is strange, and don't call me a Nordicist, it seems like sometimes the authors have confirmation bias and 0% steppe? Okay.

>>17834045
No problem but make sure to come back eventually no matter how long it takes

>>17834255
It's not about EHG being absent. It's plausible for Sardinian like samples to exist in republican rome, after all it's a few km away.
The ones with CHG are probably aegean migrants.
Kinda strange that they have no EHG but it's not impossible.
The problem is that the study uses a spurious connection at best to make the claim that anatolians specifically caused the eastern shift. The eastern shift could've come from a lot of sources.
Also the instistence on anatolians being "unchanged" from x period to y period reeks of petty nationalism.

>>17834255
If they model populations with levantine + baltic you can trust them, otherwise it's a conspiracy

>>17833941 (OP)
these are just med models, if you believe that medieval italy didn't have steppe and that claiming medieval italy had steppe is nordicist you're just hopelessly stupid

>>17835007
*these are just BAD models

>>17834255
it's kinda weird, it was made by 1 guy and published on a journal from an university in ankara

>>17835010
therefore med models

>>17833941 (OP)
>MARCH OF THE TITANS
kek

>>17835862
part 2

>>17835864
part 3

>>17835862
>>17835864
>>17835865
we wuz

>>17833941 (OP)
>0 EHG ancestry
>somehow, r1b is a most common haplo

>>17834065
>cry
Suspicious, are you really european?