Is race realism, the biological reality of race, making waves through China? Are they coming to believe the same stuff that the White Nationalists in the west are asking.

I asked co-pilot about this and it started giving an elaborate answer, and I read on the screen a few listed names of Chinese scientists talking about the biological reality of race. But then it immediately closed off half way and said it couldn't answer. Whenever I see a western AI shut off half way through an answer, I know I've found a weakness in the western orthodoxy.

So can any Chinamen on here answer for me, what do people in the Far East think about race? Is it indeed true that the scientists over there are becoming chuds.

>>17834589 (OP)
>Are they coming to believe the same stuff that the White Nationalists in the west are asking.
No because whites are brutes and indistinguishable from kikes. The Chinese are a refined people who bring prosperity to places formerly pillaged by Europeans, like Africa.

>Okay. But answer me this. Is the data and rhetoric coming out of China conflicting with the western orthodoxy on race? Just a yes or no answer, you don't need to go into detail. I seen on the screen you were posting that.

>>Yes

Okay, so co-pilot is telling me it's true.

>>17834589 (OP)
Chinese believed race realism for a long time. It can not by making waves there because that's just standard anthropology to them

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236176505_On_the_Concept_of_Race_in_Chinese_Biological_Anthropology_Alive_and_Well

>>17834640
Yeah I followed a few of the sources, and probed the AI a bit more. I basically found what you found, there was very little actual criticism of the concept of race as a concept. They use "Caucasian" and "Mongoloid" basically the same way that mid 20th century western anthropologists did.

Just how flimsy is the whole "Race is a social construct" argument if the Chinese aren't even beginning to consider it? I'm by no means an expert on this stuff, but I find it highly weird what's considered the orthodoxy in the west (Race isn't real, it's a flimsy category) doesn't even enter the debate in the Far East. Is it all really sophistry on this end?

Play around with AI though, if you're good you can get it to shut down mid question in an "Oh fuck" sort of way. It's fun to see!

>>17834589 (OP)
see pages 920-1230
chinks are very racist

>>17835853
actually that is pages 960-1213

>>17834589 (OP)
They don't want to face reality. They ignore history and basically take white supremacy and make it Yellow Supremacy. But, only Chinese Supremacy. They are desperate for this narrative and have enough reinforcement because they reproduce like rabbits and all tell each other the same thing.

>>17834747
Its pretty convenient view when there are two billion of just your nationality alone and the only other race more powerful than yours at taking over any race mixing genetics is black African.

>>17834589 (OP)
>how come china doesn't agree that negroes and europeans and chinese are the same race

nobody believes that and I wish they would stop paying people to say it.

>>17835861
just summarize. I'm not clicking on that fed crap

>>17835973
Africans and Asians and Hispanics are the children of Ham
Indians and Semites like Arabs and Jews are the children of Shem
Whites are the children of Japheth

>>17835978
>summarize
YELLOW PERIL

Race realism is Darwinian pseudoscience. Christ is King.