Why did he design atheists to be more intelligent?

>>17834840 (OP)
why did he design blacks to be so dumb?

>>17834840 (OP)
It's part of the test of faith. He wants you to be so stubbornly retarded that you ignore everybody who's smarter than you.

>>17834840 (OP)

He didn't. That's just falsified data.

>>17834840 (OP)

Dumb people are happier. I wish I was dumber.

>>17834840 (OP)
>atheists are more intelligent
>according to whom?
>a-according to other atheists...
No way you're that dumb, atheist.

>>17834868
>according to whom?
According to the empirical research.

Huge shock. People who believe in talking snakes and magic flying jews are less intelligent.

>>17834840 (OP)
What's this measuring and based on what data? n=18 doesn't mean a sample size of 18 individual people, does it?

>>17834840 (OP)
Atheists are "the God". You can't consume the product you are selling, no matter if it's either drugs or religion.

>>17834840 (OP)
This was proven already incorrect

This graph is less about "intelligence between faith" but intelligence between high and low median income

Education increases your IQ
Rich people are more likely to get education
Rich people are more likely to be atheist.

Similarly, Jewish communities have a culture that focuses on monetary income, which also increases their educational attainment.

If you divide this based on income, the Christians actually come out on top.

As such, the better question is
Why are the people most blessed by the God the ones who reject him the most

PS:
80% of Atheists can't tell what a woman is

So yeah, stuff your IQ up your ass.
You are all retards

>>17834950
>80% of Atheists can't tell what a woman is
Anti-intellectualism is a sign of low IQ anon

>>17834971
Stuff it up your ass

>>17834980
Your argument doesn't make any sense, do you want Atheists to be Republican instead? Or would you rather Christians be Democrats? Identity Politics is a sign of low IQ as well

God actually hates people who worship him according to real world evidence

creator "god" is humanity's enemy and prison warden

some psycho nerd tricked you his shitty server was the entirety of your existence

>>17834988
Well, there's no atheist in a foxhole. Constantly being menaced by the sky probably gives you a sense of higher powers at work.

That said, there's lots of plagues, natural or otherwise. Maybe infidels get more earthquakes or overdoses.

>>17834999
idk anon, your map shows God still wants to set the Bible Belt on fire, and that's after Hurricanes, Tornados, and plagues that lower your life expectancy, that's pretty harsh

>>17834999
>earthquakes
are mitigated by infrastructure
>overdoses
evidently not as the Bible Belt has an overall lower life expectancy, and Fentanyl is a real factor in that value. Face it anon, your God just hates you

>>17834950
>80% of Atheists can't tell what a woman is
Can god use his magic powers to turn a man into a woman? If so, chrustcucks believe men can become women.

>>17834840 (OP)
Out of mercy. Imagine being wrong AND dumb.
But on a more serious note, I'm glad he did that. We need people who will engineer stuff and obsess over often seemingly miniscule details that later might turn out to be practical to know. And if it were theists having to split their time between a completely materialist approach to reality and a completely supernaturalist approach to reality, chances are both disciplines would suffer. The current split is satisfactory.

>>17834867
I have yet to hear an overall intelligent person say this. It's usually young lads with above average IQ and catastrophic EQ that think it's their bright mind that makes them miserable. It's not. It's the incompetence in relating to facts in a proper way.

>>17835118
You hecking disproved all magic, man.

>>17834971
He was not being anti-intellectual. He was questioning the validity of a metric.

>>17834950
I literally can't stop thinking about trannies

>>17835199
They're hot

>>17834868
Feel free to conduct your own 100,000 person sample research

>>17834948
>This graph is less about "intelligence between faith" but intelligence between high and low median income
>Education increases your IQ
>Rich people are more likely to get education
>Rich people are more likely to be atheist.

Holy cope. So if I took a mud hut dweller from Africa and put him through Harvard he’d become high iq?

>>17835310
If a family of mudhut dwellers from Africa were put into Harvard environment, within a few generations their IQ would rise, yes. General intelligence depends on a variety of things from nutrition to environment.
Likewise, if those mudhut dwellers adopted 5 out of 10 babies from an atheistic family, the adopted 5 would grow up to have lower IQ.

>>17835310
>So if I took a mud hut dweller from Africa and put him through Harvard he’d become high iq?
Yeah if you gave his access since birth to education, good ressources, loving parents etc, he would likely become high iq/normal

>>17834948
Why are the most educated also the most skeptic then ?

>>17834971
>"The people who disagree with me on a definition are dumb"
okay pal

>>17835322
If a family of mudhut dwellers from Africa were put into Harvard environment, within a few generations their IQ would rise, yes.
Then why aren’t African Americans smart yet?
>General intelligence depends on a variety of things from nutrition to environment.
Yet a poor white person will be on average higher IQ than a rich black person. Curious.
>Likewise, if those mudhut dwellers adopted 5 out of 10 babies from an atheistic family, the adopted 5 would grow up to have lower IQ.
If blacks adopted a white kid the kid would grow up to be smarter than them.
>>17835324
>Yeah if you gave his access since birth to education, good ressources, loving parents etc, he would likely become high iq/normal
lol. Are you a leftist by any chance?

>>17835346
Are you a rightard by any chance?

>>17835346
>Then why aren’t African Americans smart yet?
Because "smarter than mudhut dwellers" doesn't necessarily mean smart.
>Yet a poor white person will be on average higher IQ than a rich black person. Curious.
It's not curious at all once you notice I talked about relative increases and relative decreases.
>If blacks adopted a white kid the kid would grow up to be smarter than them.
Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't. But it would have lower IQ compared to if it was raised in an intellectually more stimulating environment.

>>17834854
>>17834868
>>17834948
>>17834950
>provided incontrovertible proof your kind are midwits
>"IT'S DUN DERE FALSE DATA! CONSPEARACEE!"
the cognitive dissonance is hitting these wee lads hard

>>17835357
No lol. Fuck Israel and fuck Christcucks and fuck Nazis.
>Because "smarter than mudhut dwellers" doesn't necessarily mean smart.
That we can agree on
>It's not curious at all once you notice I talked about relative increases and relative decreases.
So it is race based?
>Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't. But it would have lower IQ compared to if it was raised in an intellectually more stimulating environment.
It’s not a maybe. Unless the white kid got some real fucked up genes he’ll be smarter than his parents IQ wise by age 13. If I took a baby from Ethiopia and placed him under the care of two rich, well educated white people he would still grow up to be dumber than a white kid from Appalachia who grew up in a crack house.

>>17834854
It's not, it's a case of "averages" they call them, or "statistics"--there are "outliers" they call them.

>>17835346
Have a look at typical African American environments. They're not IQ maxxing at all, they're probably selecting for increased anti-Harvard genes than they'd have been in sub-saharan regions pre-machetes and tuxedo shoes. The point is if they were consistently subject to IQ glorifying environments for many more generations, and women were consistently only sleeping with "successful" black guys, you could expect their IQs would rise on average to Eurasian levels. The way I think this happens at first usually is through something like a strict caste/class system. Elite cognitive networks hooking each other up with other elite cognitives and then it trickles down through economic-cultural forces.

>>17835346
>If blacks adopted a white kid the kid would grow up to be smarter than them.
>If I took a baby from Ethiopia and placed him under the care of two rich, well educated white people he would still grow up to be dumber than a white kid from Appalachia who grew up in a crack house

It's funny you say that because the minnesota transracial study, the infamous one often cited by retards like you, when accounted for attrition, proves that black kids educated by white parents have the same iq as white kids adopted by white parents.

>>17835390
What is a woman

>>17834867
Making you worship and tribute is a form of loosh farming but you underage christ larping will never know this

Meanwhile atheist contributions are
>............
Wow... What intelligent people....

>heh people of the past were so stupid for trusting what the priests told them, not like me! I'm an intellectual!
>why do I believe in germ theory or the heliocentric model? Uhhh someone else discovered it and told me about it