>We shall fight on the beaches
Why though? I don’t get it. They could’ve signed a white peace in exchange for minor territorial loses in Africa. Was he stupid?

you lost hans

>>17840773
So did you.

>>17840753 (OP)
>just let germany conquer all of europe and plunder its resources going against all continental strategy
>they totally won't renege on any guarantees, those honest nazis
idiot
>inb4 lost the empire, muzzies, trannys
irrelevant

>>17840787
Regular reminder that Britain and Evropa were 99% white ethnostates and the average Evropean would be considered a frothing far right racist by modern standards, prior to September 1939.

>>17840753 (OP)
Africa? Hitler wanted Europe

>>17840880
and in 1945 Clement Attlee was elected and by 1948 the Windrush arrived, it didn't take long for these "frothing far right racists" to allow a low IQ high crime demographic that hates white people to start shitting up london

>>17840911
You mean the Windrush who noone wanted and were unasked for?

>>17840753 (OP)
>they could have just dropped their 4 centuries old policy of keeping balance between the powers of continental Europie and in return lose their african colonies
How appealing. Weird they chose to fight and win instead.

>>17840988
But they hecking lost because uhhh theres migrant workers from Pakistan

>>17840773

>>17840753 (OP)
>Just surrender continental hegemony to Germany
Why? Britain could just wait them out. Even if America never joined the war they could have taken North Africa with relative ease and blockaded Gwrmany while submarine warfare was never remotely close to starving Britain. Worst comes to worst they just have another Napoleon situation where they instigate wars against Germany while fighting small campaigns and blockading Europe for a decade until Germany collapses under the weight of fighting on multiple fronts.

>>17841553
Britain was had hegemony over Europe. France did prior to WW2 and America did after

>>17841676
*Britain never had hegemony over Europe