>>17841560 (OP)Being a closed system. Objectivism requires everyone to be an objectivist. Good fucking luck convincing each individual person to be one. As a personal philosophy of individualism it can be fine, but what kills it is the inherent political aspect to it which is absurdly vulnerable to sectarianism. It's the logical conclusion of pretending that the "social contract" can be a real thing: hey, how about we get every last person in the world to sign the contract willingly?
I'm very sympathetic to the views of personal and economic freedom that it espouses, but no, instead it's better to adopt a pragmatic stance with an open system that embraces contradiction as a feature rather than a bug, inviting participation for those who care, but also clarifying that we need a structure of arbitrary rules and enforcement because it's more practical to tax everyone to fund police, courts and prisons instead of preventing crime through dialectics.