>>17844729 (OP)You say you “don’t care to win arguments” because you think history will vindicate you. In truth, you reject dialogue because you cannot defend your position within reason and so retreat into apocalyptic certainty, the last refuge of the intellectually bankrupt.
Hitler was not a radical. He was a reactionary of the lowest order. He was not a visionary, but a cultural necrophile, dragging Germany backward into a paganized racial dreamtime. His backwards economic doctrine is just imperial Keynesianism fused with race mysticism. Two destructive, degenerative, materialistic and logically incoherent components.
He destroyed Germany because he had no concept of the human as a creature of Reason. He saw only race, will, and annihilation. He was the mirror image of the British Empire: a romantic imperialist whose goal was not to build, but to dominate, or commit suicide after trying and failing.
>The truth will be revealedThat is not truth. That is Gnostic rot; the self-pitying theology of men who failed to participate in discovery, composition, or principle.
Let me offer you another model:
>SchillerWrote that the true tragedy is not when the bad man acts, but when the good man fails through weakness.
>LeibnizSaw reason and optimism not as naivety, but as necessary corollaries of a lawful universe.
>Joan of ArcDied to resurrect a nation’s soul.
>BeethovenComposed universal brotherhood into sound, and refused to bow to emperors.
>Plato Warned that tyranny begins not with strength but with a populace too confused to distinguish strength from madness.
You have mistaken decay for truth. You have mistaken humiliation for martyrdom. And you have mistaken a failed shitty painter who couldn't get perspective right (simple line work a toddler can do with a ruler) for a prophet. You want to believe you were “wronged.” But the truth is worse: you’ve been deceived by the very forces you think you oppose.