>>17847248 (OP)No, the official position of both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches is that images are permitted.
>As the sacred and life-giving cross is everywhere set up as a symbol, so also should the images of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, the holy angels, as well as those of the saints and other pious and holy men be embodied in the manufacture of sacred vessels, tapestries, vestments, etc., and exhibited on the walls of churches, in the homes, and in all conspicuous places, by the roadside and everywhere, to be revered by all who might see them. For the more they are contemplated, the more they move to fervent memory of their prototypes. Therefore, it is proper to accord to them a fervent and reverent veneration, not, however, the veritable adoration which, according to our faith, belongs to the Divine Being alone—for the honor accorded to the image passes over to its prototype, and whoever venerate the image venerate in it the reality of what is there represented.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Council_of_Nicaea
There was also a suppressed Catholic Council of Bishops that came to a different outcome than at Nicaea. Their decision was suppressed by the pope and forgotten until the Protestant Reformation. Protestant leaders like John Calvin read the results of both councils and rejected both.
>Ultimately, the council condemned the Adoptionist heresy and revoked the Nicene Council's decrees regarding holy icons, condemning both iconodulism (veneration of icons) and iconoclasm (destruction of icons), "allowing that images could be useful educational devices, but denying that they were worthy of veneration."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Frankfurt