Thread 17847622

There was never a Jewish or Russian conspiracy to destroy Western civilization. He killed millions of people because he suffered from schizophrenia

>>17847622 (OP)
Weimar proves you wrong shlomo

he lost the only war he fought.

And he broke the cardinal rule of leaving your country in a better place than you got it. IMHO he is no different than a nigger

>>17847622 (OP)
>There was never a Jewish or Russian conspiracy to destroy Western civilization.

ITT: OP is a zoomer who uses psychology terms despite not even being a psychology major

>>17847624
Weimar was a prosperous and culturally rich democracy

>>17847622 (OP)
https://archive.org/details/thrtw2/mode/2up
The jews in Weimar Germany acted in their typical jewish ways, and Adolf Hitler's response was rather mild. Only 6 million jews, at most.

>>17847622 (OP)
He was right about the Soviets at least. I mean, they did spread their degenerate ideology throughout the world with varying degrees of success during the Cold War.

Jewtastic thread.

>>17847622 (OP)
>psychoanalysis
The jig is up, schlomo

>>17847622 (OP)
I think he was pretty clear that it was a Jewish conspiracy for one.

>>17847833
mm, that one's not even a conspiracy theory. They were open about their ultimate goals. Does OP think every capitalist during the cold war was a schizo too

>>17848873
As a democracy it was pretty weak (since nazis dismantled it) but the standards of living were quite high in 1925-1929 (higher than during hitler years)
>>17848875
Stalin never wanted to rule the world; it would undermine his position as the dictator if there were no enemies

>>17847622 (OP)
Russians, Poles, Jews, etc. were scapegoated for all the evil Anglos and Germans have inflicted on the world

>>17849008
Why did he want to rule Eastern Europe? An iron Curtain fell across Europe. There was no free and fair elections in Poland like Stalin promised

>>17848873
My same reaction

>>17849907
Literally the opposite

>>17847622 (OP)
There was a Russian conspiracy to destroy western society, he was apart of it, don’t forget he signed a peace treaty with Russia because whether you like it or not, national socialism IS STILL socialism

>>17847622 (OP)
He seems to have been fairly accurate on all points. What specific point was he wrong about?

Hitler on democracy and capitalism:
https://argentbeacon.com/films/alerta-judiada/adolf-hitler-the-man-who-fought-the-bank/
Goebbels on Jews:
https://argentbeacon.com/films/alerta-judiada/the-jewish-problem-dr-goebbels/
Hitler on Palestine:
https://files.catbox.moe/oswmzk.mp4
Hitler on why they hate Germany:
https://files.catbox.moe/kzc2z0.mp4
Hitler on art and culture:
https://files.catbox.moe/4lbitt.mp4
Hitler on race:
https://files.catbox.moe/czva93.mp4
Hitler on the meaning of Europe:
https://files.catbox.moe/ud7q94.mp4
Hitler's war for all mankind:
https://gofile.io/d/GCqq3s

>>17847622 (OP)
Most people never change their minds. It does not matter how many facts you give them. Arguing with most people most of the time is an exercise in futility. Especially in a place like this. Just imagine if you had a gun to your head and you had to justify your opponent's point of view no matter what, and you will know most of the time where the conversation will head.

>>17850054
Russia came up with a plan to have Hitler invade them and kill 27 million Russians?

England and Germany destroyed Russia with communism and hitler was hoping that engand would just let them take over russia's sphere of influence.

>>17847622 (OP)
He wasn't really wrong about the enemy, he was just wrong that there's a chance against wining against them.
There isn't.

>>17850115
Hitler wanted to reshape the world and destroy Western democracy. This makes him the enemy of the West. There was nothing Western about national socialism.

>>17850136
Western Europe wasn't democratic for most of its history. In fact democracy is an abnormality in history in general, usually preceding eras of decay

>>17850150
>usually preceding eras of decay
What does this even mean?

>>17850136
Wow, you really like democracy, but is being ruled by blackmailed pedophiles owned by zionist capital really all that democratic? An authoritarian state with an ideological inclination to further the interests of their population is more likely to deliver on democratic demands than an occupation regime controlled by foreign criminals.

We will always get racial replacement, economic deregulation, social degeneracy and genocidal zionism regardless of how many times we vote against these things, because calling somethimg a democracy doesn't necessarily mean that the people rule.

>>17850135
There is a chance if the Germanic peoples actually fought for themselves. Also America won't be a problem going forward because they've destroyed themselves

>>17847622 (OP)
He killed millions because it was an open question whether superior modern arms and european nationalism could literally crush any opposition. It was in everyone's best interest to find out, in the long run.

>>17850160
It's not just democracy, but parliamentary system in general. Nazi Germany was a totalitarian one party state and the fuhrer was essentially above the law. Even HRE wasn't like this.

>>17850160
>being ruled by blackmailed pedophiles owned by zionist capital
I dont' even know what you refer to. This is still a thread about 1930s Germany, right?

>>17850195
>Nazi Germany was a totalitarian one party state and the fuhrer was essentially above the law. Even HRE wasn't like this.
Nazi Germany is also the only historical example of Jewish plutocracy being peacefully removed from power. In a world where Jewish financial syndicates specialize in bribing, blackmailing and assassinating the indigenous leadership caste of their host population, totalitarian hyperideological paramilitary leadership may be the only alternative to Jewish rule

>I dont' even know what you refer to. This is still a thread about 1930s Germany, right?
All western democracies in the 1930s were just as much zionist pedophile blackmail states as our governments are today, nothing has changed.