It's safe to say that many of you people are more dismayed by the psyop of liberal feminism than anything else. However, it's curious how none of you recognize the ultimate point and the logical and extremist conclusion of feminism.

Read all of this:
https://saidit.net/s/BlackPillFeminism/comments/bfai/why_i_oppose_sltshaming_the_real_definition_of/

Liberal Feminism sees patriarchy as the enemy and blames socialization. It seeks equality.

Radical feminism (and the Pinkpill) sees the masculine as the enemy and blames biology. It seeks to have women reclaim their natural role as eugenicists.

But: GYNOCENTRISM sees androcentrism as the enemy: the masculine, its institutions, and any feminine being who sympathizes with an XY chromosome. Gynocentrism blames evolution and a past deviation within it. Its solution is gynofascism, systematic genocide, and a complete reconstruction of the gene pool.

Your enemy is not only feminism. Is Gynocentrism as a whole. Never forget how much they hate you. They don't see you as resources. They don't see you as humans. They want to slay you like an animal. It's the only thing that gives them psychological, and spiritual joy.

>>17848129 (OP)
Feminism is biological

western feminism is just a psyop by rich white women who feel resentment towards rich white men, they use women of color and poor women as shields. The end goal of western white feminism under capitalism is to be a worker drone/boss bitch who never has kids or a husband. Feminism like homosexuality and leftism is no longer a threat to capital cause they were all absorbed by it.

the only reason trannies are having a hard time is because they havent thrown their extremists under the bus and havent embraced liberal capitalism, thus showing they are no longer a threat

>>17848160
reductionism is very cringe-worthy
feminism is as old as at least the Middle Ages

>>17848161
i said nothing about how old feminism is you dip, i said western feminism is a tool of capital now, its not a threat to anyone, why do you think they wanted women to get jobs, its cheap labour, just like immigration

>>17848160
Of course, it wasn't the women's choice, in fact, a group did a mega brainwashing, the poor women were just deceived... wow. poor them

>>17848168
That's exactly why, you imbecile. For your argument to make sense that capital is the reason for this, it would only have to be in times where decentralized or in times after the industrial revolution, but unfortunately for your argument, feminism is older than that. Blaming everything on capital is being very simplistic.

>>17848129 (OP)
>it's curious how none of you recognize the ultimate point and the logical and extremist conclusion of feminism.
The overwhelming majority here have concluded that feminism is merely a noisy political movement, ignoring the social, cultural, and even religious ills that this way of life has brought. And of course, historians believe that old-fashioned feminism was "good," just like the right. Are most anti-feminists anti-feminists from the 4th century onward? Most are 1st or 2nd wave feminists, at least. Garbage feminism is part of human psychology now. It's easier to abolish human rights or legalize slavery than to end feminism. You retards only focus on women who take to the streets screaming and treat that as the only thing to worry about with feminism, but the biggest enemies are those women in political office and in education, who shaped generations without anyone realizing. Furthermore, ALL of you accepted Complementarianism as legitimate, without realizing that it is just a Trojan horse.
Feminism won, its over, fuck, its over
Seethe and cope

>>17848129 (OP)
People will find any reason to hate one another. They will delude their senses for the high they get being drunk off their own ignorance. Women are no exception. All have their given sentiments of opposite genders, but it is ultimately a meaningless endeavor. Because if the underlying problems persist it does not matter what demographic is considered crowned above the rest. Small minds.

>>17848129 (OP)
>Liberal Feminism
>Radical feminism
These distinctions aren't helpful
Since trying to create a "radical feminism" implies that there is a non-radical feminism, and feminism was born from radicalism from the beginning.
>Liberal
Do you know what liberal is? Feminism is a child of communism and liberalism. But although it's older than that, the concept itself wasn't organized around a narrative that gives meaning to events. But the feminist seed has always been with us.
>>17848187
correct
>>17848171
Even if this were the case (it wasn't), it would be sufficient argument to ban women from any public space, even the smallest one.

>>17848193
>Semantics
>on