Is the Douay-Rheims the only English Bible that recalls Lamentations as a Hebrew acrostic poem like Psalm 118 (119)?
>That’s just the Baronius Press or 1899 American edition, or the 1750 Challoner Revision.
No, it’s in the marginal notes of the original 1610 edition.
https://archive.org/details/1610A.d.DouayOldTestament1582A.d.RheimsNewTestament_176/page/n1640/mode/1up

>>17848437 (OP)

>>17848439

>>17848437 (OP)
It's normal for bibles (New Oxford Annotated in this case) to explain it.
But I don't know any that will prefix the Hebrew letter.

Plenty do, like the KJV and the NET translation.
https://biblehub.com/net/lamentations/1.htm
https://biblehub.com/net/lamentations/1.htm

>>17848698
Whoops, posted the same link twice. here's the KJV's formatting which i particularly like.
https://biblehub.com/kjv/lamentations/1.htm

>>17848698
>>17848704
Perhaps I was too hasty in making my post. I only checked Biblehub by verse and not by chapter.
Now, I’ve checked all my English Bibles. The Collins white KJVs with covers, Holman bilingual KJV/ Reina-Valera, Oxford with Apocrypha, and Hendrickson 1611 edition all don’t have the Hebrew letters; I wonder which printed KJV does. The only ones that I’ve found that have the Hebrew letters beside the Douay-Rheims are Catholic Bibles (not Catholic editions like the RSVCE or NRSVCE but ones translated by Catholic scholars), namely the CTS Jerusalem Bible and the New Jerusalem Bible.