>How old was Mary when God impregnated her without consent?
>TELL ME YOU FUCK

>>17850772 (OP)
She was 13, and no, she did not give consent. No 13 year old says shit like: "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” (Luke 1:38).

>>17850772 (OP)
She was obviously 43 and signed the sexual consent form after traveling the world to find herself, the way God intended.

>>17851005
Everyone wanted God dick before Jesus ruined it

>>17851005
>13
That's sick. Quick someone draw a politically biting "satire" picture of this occurrance

>>17850772 (OP)
>>How old was Mary when God impregnated her without consent?
We don't know, the Bible doesn't say.
>>TELL ME YOU FUCK
I already told you, we don't know.

Also, it wasn't without consent. This was her reaction when she was told that she would give birth to the Messiah:

>And Mary said, “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.”
Luke 1:38
>>17851005
>She was 13
Nowhere in the Bible does it say this, or even hints at her being 13.
>No 13 year old says shit like
Doesn't that then indicate to you that she was, you know, not 13, and she might have been a grown woman?
>>17851030
>She was obviously 43
The Bible also doesn't say this. Nobody knows when her pregnancy happened, no one can tell, the Bible doesn't say.

>>17851441
Why did Christians make a tale of Cuckoldry and illegimate children their central myth?

>>17851469
>Why did Christians make a tale of Cuckoldry and illegimate children their central myth?
What cuckoldry? Mary did not cheat on Joseph, she never lost her virginity, they hadn't even gotten married yet.

>Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly. But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:

>“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”

>When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.

Matthew 1:18-25

>>17851005
>>17851441
Damn bruh that's fucked up that she was 13. Just a child

>>17851565
>she was 13.
Chapter and verse, please.

>>17851568

>>17851570
>The Bible does not explicity state Mary's age when she gave birth to Jesus.

If she was 13
would that be a problem for Christianity?

>>17851591
Not really, since the entire point of Mary is that there was no sex involved in her pregnancy and she never lost her virginity. So any accusation of pedophilia is wrong from the get go.

>>17851597
I'm confident God could impregnate an 11 year-old, sexually. Without God being a pedophile.
I don't understand why this should be a concern

>>17851584
It was in the Bible, just got censored by Constantine and the canonization by the Council of Nicea. Learn your early church history

>>17851620
I'm gonna need a source for that, chief.

If it was censored in Nicaea, how come you know it?

>>17851475
Its a tale of cuckoldry that magically isn't cuckoldry because Its God. Its a tale of an illegitimate child who isn't illegitimate because the dad is God.

>>17851620
>>17851630
Also why would they censor her age? It's not like a girl getting pregnant at 13 would've been scandalous to them.

>>17851634
>>17851630
>spoonfeed me
No, newfag

>>17851649
>Mary's age being censored at the council of Nicaea is a self-evident fact.
lul

>>17851649
>please substantiate your claim
>lol no.

>>17850772 (OP)
>God impregnated her without consent?
She was asking for it

>>17851632
The blind man that Jesus healed was not physically blind from birth. He was some guy who use to go to the temple, and pretend to be physically blind so that he could beg for money. Jesus rubbed dirt in his eyes, and he freaked out and washed it off, because it burned. Everyone then knew he could see. The blindness that Jesus cured was his lying about being physically blind.

Stop thinking about the bible in terms of physical truths. Its a spiritual book. Jesus speaks In parables. There is a double meaning, and you are focused on straw man argumants.

>>17851990
>The blind man that Jesus healed was not physically blind from birth. He was some guy who use to go to the temple, and pretend to be physically blind so that he could beg for money. Jesus rubbed dirt in his eyes, and he freaked out and washed it off, because it burned. Everyone then knew he could see. The blindness that Jesus cured was his lying about being physically blind.
Nowhere in the Bible does it say this:

>As he passed by, he saw a man blind from birth. And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming, when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” Having said these things, he spit on the ground and made mud with the saliva. Then he anointed the man’s eyes with the mud and said to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means Sent). So he went and washed and came back seeing.

>The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar were saying, “Is this not the man who used to sit and beg?” Some said, “It is he.” Others said, “No, but he is like him.” He kept saying, “I am the man.” So they said to him, “Then how were your eyes opened?” He answered, “The man called Jesus made mud and anointed my eyes and said to me, ‘Go to Siloam and wash.’ So I went and washed and received my sight.” They said to him, “Where is he?” He said, “I do not know.”
John 9:1-12

>>17851990
The "begger" at the temple IS the blind priests. They are blind, and they are sitting around begging for free alms. This story ties into Jesus calling them all "blind guides".

>>17851990
>>17852010
Or, you know, maybe Jesus actually performed a miracle and cured a blind man because he is the savior.

>>17852006
>the works of God might be displayed in him
The blind man is a priest.

>anointed the man's eyes
Annointed the eyes of Man.
The Son of Man is God.

>>17852012
>didn't capitalize the h in "He"
You're going to hell sinner, that's blasphemy

>>17852012
He did cure a blind man.
He cured a blind priest, and woke him up to the power of the Son of Man.
He also cured a paralyzed man on the Sabbath by telling him to pick up his prayer rug and walk.

Do not TELL them about ME. Go, present yourself as a testimony that you have been healed.

Faith without works is dead.

>>17851441
God personally told me Mary was 43 after I prayed about it for 12 hours straight. He sent me an angel with some golden tablets but I misplaced them so just trust me bro. God also said I have to sleep with your wife.

>>17851469
Because Christianity is the cult of Typhon-Set-Yahweh, the chaos worm, lord of lies, treachery, and desolation. To them what is filthy is holy, so it is fitting that their mossiach was a bastard born off a child prostitute.

>>17851990
>Blind people can't feel pain in their eyes

>>17852026
>Do not TELL them about ME
You type like someone having a manic episode. Are you ok, anon?

>>17852133
>least cultish american christian:

>>17851005
I seriously doubt girls were even having periods at 13 in the early Roman Empire.