Did chariots actually change warfare all that much? It doesn't seem like they would.

>>17850808 (OP)
Something to remember is that because of the smaller sizes of horses in the bronze age chariots predated true cavalry by quite a lot. You shouldn't compare them to cavalry, you should compare them to infantry.

They were primarily skirmishers, so they were a hit and run unit that nobody could catch.

>can move much faster and further than any infantry
>can carry more ammunition than infantry
>they noise and speed is really scary for infantry

They're just a great unit for regions with vast flat terrain.

>>17850808 (OP) Higher ground.

>>17850808 (OP)
Damn Egyptians looked like THAT?

>>17850837
Tiny brown kemet bussy ready to be stretched and gaped by hyksos cock

>>17850808 (OP)
>did being able to quickly move around the battlefield while also providing a stable platform for archery and javelins actually change warfare all that much? It doesn't seem like they would.

>>17850808 (OP)
From my understanding not really. They were useful on flat terrain like Egypt for a time but like the other anon says eventually cavalry tactics and horse strength improved making them obsolete.

>>17850808 (OP)
Uh...please tell me that thing isn't made of iron...

>>17850837
Probably not. That artists was a known boy-appreciater.

>>17851462
He was French, its normal there.

>>17851478
Why did all the boys he draw have the exact same face? Who even looks like that?

>>17851055
they dominated the bronze age to the point that "the rise of effective anti-chariot tactics" is a credible theory for the LBA collapse

>>17851478
Retarded take. They literally elected a president who fucked and married his hot teacher.

>>17851518
>they elected a guy who was groomed as a boy by a cougar
I rest my case