Thread 17850964 - /his/ [Archived: 338 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/18/2025, 4:01:24 AM No.17850964
Benjamin_Disraeli_by_Cornelius_Jabez_Hughes,_1878
Benjamin_Disraeli_by_Cornelius_Jabez_Hughes,_1878
md5: 35ce42526ca2ab3e9e66883a484db263🔍
>First jewish Prime Minster of the UK
>is named Benjamin Da Israeli
Who the fuck writes this shit?
Replies: >>17851220 >>17851372
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 4:10:16 AM No.17850981
he was also an open jewish supremacist who wrote books about how gentiles need jews who are a superior race (Tancred), lol Anglos have always been top goy cattle
Replies: >>17851118 >>17851120 >>17851220
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 5:43:35 AM No.17851118
>>17850981
>be Disraeli
>Convert to Anglicanism
>Marry purebred Englishwoman
>Practically worship Queen Victoria
>Give a larger amount of British subjects the vote via the 1867 reform acts
>Spend most of your political career trying to expand British power internationally
>150 years later, schizos on 4chan call you a Jewish supremacist because you wrote books about being Jewish.
Replies: >>17851220 >>17851295 >>17851439
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 5:45:19 AM No.17851120
>>17850981
List these books.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 6:49:28 AM No.17851220
>>17850964 (OP)
>>17850981
>>17851118
Disraeli's purchase of Suez involved bypassing parliament and indebting the British state to his 'close friend' Lionel de Rothschild. What a patriotic English gentleman!
Replies: >>17851237 >>17851253 >>17851301 >>17851430
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 7:03:59 AM No.17851237
>>17851220
>Disraeli's purchase of Suez involved bypassing parliament
How so?
>and indebting the British state
The loan was paid back. Loans from private bankers was a centuries-old practice.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 7:19:40 AM No.17851253
>>17851220
The Suez was one of Britain’s few profitable colonial investments though
Replies: >>17851260
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 7:25:39 AM No.17851260
>>17851253
>colonies were not profitable
Replies: >>17851263 >>17851300
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 7:32:44 AM No.17851263
>>17851260
Most were not.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 8:01:04 AM No.17851295
>>17851118
Cope.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 8:06:54 AM No.17851300
>>17851260
Most were only profitable before the late 18th century when the spice trade was in full swing. There's quite literally nothing profitable about babysitting billions of Africans. America doesn't even directly govern those countries and they've spent the equivalent of 50 Marshal Plans on them.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 8:08:08 AM No.17851301
>>17851220
>Disraeli's purchase of Suez
taking control of the Suez canal unironically benefited the country and made it more powerful though, what's the problem with that?
Replies: >>17851320
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 8:24:21 AM No.17851320
>>17851301
The French owned the majority of the Suez at the time. Disraeli purchased some of the shares and let the Rothchilds reap the interest reward. It was a political scandal as he made the transaction in secret.
Gladstone invaded Egypt a decade later so England could monopolize the canal
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 9:09:58 AM No.17851372
>>17850964 (OP)
thankfully the last one aswell
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 9:56:17 AM No.17851430
>>17851220
>Noooooo you can't make it months faster and safer to travel between your jewel in the crown cash cow colony and the metropole because... because...BECAUSE DA JOOOOOOO!!!!
Replies: >>17851448
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 9:59:50 AM No.17851439
>>17851118
He was still a Jewish supremacist despite his conversion to Anglicanism and this is obvious in his writings and quotations.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 10:03:14 AM No.17851448
>>17851430
Why did he make the transaction in secret if there was nothing to hide? Also why was he using the British government and treasury as a tool to make business with his personal friends?