>north Italians are Germ-

>>17854684 (OP)
To be fair most northern italians know they aren't germans.
You are accostumed to schizo twitter trannies no lifers but most know they are similar to central italians for example. The original North Italian separatism included Italy up to Marche.
The whole northern italian insularism is:
1. North Italian schizos
2. Nordicist magnifying the difference between italians to explain their huge amount of accomplishments (stupid either way as Tuscany is probably the region with most accomplishments, certainly not Aosta Valley).
Basically an unholy alliance of virgins. Don't let them taint your idea of north italians that are an hard working group, among the best in yrop.

>>17854830
/thread

Need to add a Slavic source for the northeast.

>Veneto and Trentino lower than Piedmont
Makes literally no sense. Bad model with Verona overfitting.

>>17854830
>To be fair most northern italians know they aren't germans.
we also know we aren't terronis

>>17854920
You are merely terroni with Germanic and Celtic admixture without a doubt

>>17854933
we are different from terronis, i know you hate it when i remind you of that lol

>>17854933
actually both north italians and south italians have similar percentages of germanic ancestry, the main difference is that north italians have more native italic ancestry and less middle eastern ancestry, they are the natives of italy

>>17854907
he's using meme samples

>>17854946
Yes because you got raped by the Goths, Lombards and Franks

>>17854977
you forgot to mention that we're less west asian admixed

>>17854920
True, know the difference, the tall one is sicilian, the two hyper-manlets are lombards

We don't have extra Iran_N!!! G25 told me so!

>>17855041
why are you describing them to me as if i didn't know them?

>>17854948
"Middle easterners" have been native to Italy since 600 BC.
>>17854907
>>17854970
No overall that's good model.

>>17855292
germanics have been native to italy since 200 AC

>>17855352
pre-historical Italy ≠ late antiquity Italy

>>17855551
late iron age isn't "pre history", pre history means before writing systems
and most of the west asian ancestry in the penninsula came at the very end of the republic, i was generous i could have counted the 600 BC northern european outliers in central italy like you counted the west asian drifted outliers

point is: stop coping, this is why people don't like terronis, you can just end this conversation by saying, "yes we have more west asian admixture than you and you have more local iron age ancestry", but no of course, reality needs to bend to the will of terronis

>>17855590
North europeans were outliers in 600 BC, while east meds were the majority in many parts of south Italy.

>>17854684 (OP)
Verona samples are mostly Celts who plot with French people and have excess WHG groid black skinned ancestry, so the are very Northern shifted.

Southerners are majority Hellenistic people, they are the descendent of Aristoteles, and none in the south denies that. The problem is that people like to lump Southerners with Mulatto Arap Levantines, while even Cypriots have barely 3% SSA admixture.

>>17855631
>Verona samples are mostly Celts who plot with French people and have excess WHG groid black skinned ancestry, so the are very Northern shifted.
Yes, north Italian natives.

>>17855631
no one gives a shit, low iq retard, african ancestry is out of the scope of my post, cypriots aren't related to me whether they have 0 or 20% african ancestry, you have more west asian ancestry than we do and we have more native ancestry, this is not a indictment of character, i didn't call any of these ancestries bad or good, try to understand this, low iq

>>17855627
>while east meds were the majority in many parts of south Italy
they weren't, see iron age sicilians and daunians, stop warping reality around your insecurities

>>17855661
A Portuguese and a Spaniard could say the same to you.

"We don't care about African ancestry but we have 20% less west Asia ancestry than you"

The level of these people. They can't see their image in a mirror.

>>17855665
They were in their colonies.

>>17855685
What's the matter with true West Asian ancestry (not Arapoid mulatto DNA)?

Even Imperial Roman mutt slaves have a higher IQ than Germanics according to Nordicist DNA studies. Germanics never accomplished anything before the Jews got control of their central banks in the 17th century.

>>17855685
>A Portuguese and a Spaniard could say the same to you.
and i wouldn't care about that, cypriots are levantines, i don't care about their african ancestry, learn to accept facts, such as southern italians having more west asian than us and us having more native ancestry, the only reply you should give is "yes you are right", anything else is cope, bullshits, insecurities, spite and seethe

>>17855694
>What's the matter
nothing, i didn't make an indictment of character, i didn't say this is good or bad, and i don't care about intelligence
you have more west asian than is, that's all i said and the only reply i'm expecting is yes

>>17855711
>cypriots are levantines
>SSA admxiture doesn't count

Ok with that. But you are a Terrone to a fucking Portuguese. And I am masturbating on that.

>>17855730
projection, you think i'm here seething like you when i couldn't give two shits about it, i don't know why you would even bring up the portugese
the whole genome matters more than 2 percent more "sub saharan", you clown, cypriots are literally a bunch of lebanese
you have more west asian and we have more native ancestry, that's it, you have no reasons to even mention portugese, cypriots, arabs, whgs this and that and this and that, just admit it, and the conversation will be over as if we never talked before
also see why you are considered obnoxious globally? you can't have a normal conversation

>>17855770
>Le I don't care man
>I say this phrase "I don't care" so I win every debate

This guy is comical. You won the debate. Now I give you some candies

>>17855788
no, i say this sentence "i don't care" because you bring up shit no one cares about, literally projecting your ancestral insecurities on others, you genuinely think i'm here fuming like you because the portugese are closer to europe than north italians overall? i genuinely don't give a single a fuck
>You won the debate. Now I give you some candies
i know that i won the debate, next time when i say "you guys have more west asian ancestry than us", you just say "yes, this is factually correct", you don't add any more to the conversation, you don't assume i imply it's a bad thing and you don't start rambling about irrelevant lower single digit sub saharan ancestry when we are talking about the whole genomes of the populations in question

>>17855631
>Verona samples are mostly Celts who plot with French people
They plot more with Catalans and overall more with Iberians than with French.