Christianity is spiritual leftism. >Everyone is equal under God
>No matter how sinful or good you are, God views you the same
>"There is neither Jew nor Greek"
Christianity promotes weakness, neuroticism, and dysgenics.

>>17854876 (OP)
That modern interpretation, that all races are of God and called to be a part of the body of Christ, is a heresy which destroyed the religion.

Slave owning white Christians, untied as the body of God in Christ, subjugated the earth in the name of the Son to glorify the Father.

>>17854876 (OP)
Obviously, not even a Christian but this seems like spirituality 101
>All people are equal
>All people deserve to be treated well
>Do good to all people
>Do not see yourself as above others
Basic tenets of all true religions

>>17854883
They did so DESPITE their Christianity, not BECAUSE of it.

>>17854876 (OP)

I personally follow Shintoism.

No that's just intrinsic white people beliefs that all men are created equal.

>>17854886
lol, no.

>>17854884
>All people are equal
Not true. Just not true.
>All people deserve to be treated well
What do you mean by "well" here? We should give respect to all people. But we should also give respect to animals. Some people should be treated differently than others.
>Do good to all people
Vacuous statement.
>Do not see yourself as above others
Actually I do think I am above some people. Especially those of foreign and savage nations.

>>17854889
That doesn't dispute my point. Moreover, I'm not even saying that Christianity is left wing in a political sense. It is, though, as if leftism were applied to the spiritual realm.

>>17854895
>That doesn't dispute my point
Yeah, it does.

>>17854932
Only if you believe the church is infallible.

>>17854937
Thankfully I can discern what is and is not an effort to destroy what God sent his Son to save.

>>17854951
You still haven't disputed my original point.

>>17854876 (OP)
Christianity is a shared religious delusion because gods do not exist

>>17854957
Your original point wasn't a point, it was a fallacious assertion.

>>17854965
Why is it wrong then? The only response you've mustered is that many Christians aren't political leftists. Not a response to the point.

>>17854983
Expecting me to disprove your fallacious assertion is not good argumentation. You should instead support your own assertions, lest you want to be burdened with disproving any ridiculous claim that can be made by anyone.

>>17854992
I literally made the argument in the OP

>>17854995
Yes, and your OP was riddled with problems, like for example it presupposes that everyone is a Galatian. Furthermore, Jesus himself said his salvation isn't intended for everyone.

>>17854998
>Jesus himself said his salvation isn't intended for everyone.
But that's not based on any inherent or natural differences, it's solely based on whether you bow down to him.

>>17855000
Well that is certainly an interesting interpretation, fallacious as it is, but I do doubt you will be supporting it with anything beyond your personal sense of what you think constitutes right and wrong.

>>17855003
Because that's literally how Christianity works? I guess you're some heretic but you're not making arguments, just declaring yourself to be correct.

>>17855011
Obviously that is not how it works because that isn't how it was practiced until modern times.

>>17855025
It literally is though. Just because they weren't political leftists doesn't change the religion.

>>17855046
No, it isn't. Slave owning whites formed the body of Christ until basically yesterday. That was to ensure their own eternal life, required by God for their salvation. Your strange blind beliefs are antithetical to everything Jesus was about, and what is worse is that your ideas are not capable of saving anyone from anything.

>>17854883
>>17854889
>>17854888
>>17854892
>>17855061
>>>Christogenea.com

>>17855061
Oh it's this retard again.
>brown people can't be Christians because they were enslaved in the past even though Christianized Romans enslaved White Europeans for centuries
Watch him dance circles around this.

>>17855061
>your beliefs are antithetical to everything Jesus was about
Yes. I believe in true justice, not the oppressive equality of Christianity.

>>17855072
Did you ever actually prove that assertion? It is after all the fact that Christ set his people free. I think you are conflating some ethnic outgroup with the ingroup here in order to muddy the waters, both literally and metaphorically.
>>17855066
Still incorrect, but continue to guess at my identity if you want. I warn you however that you will never guess it correctly.

>>17855079
>the oppressive equality of Christianity
>>17854883
>That modern interpretation, that all races are of God and called to be a part of the body of Christ, is a heresy which destroyed the religion.
>Slave owning white Christians, untied as the body of God in Christ, subjugated the earth in the name of the Son to glorify the Father.

>>17854876 (OP)
Follow the oldest pagan tradition.
Converting to Christianity.

>>17855102
I'm actually a deist, I just posted vrag because why not

>>17855086
>inane gibberish to avoid confronting the contradiction in his claims
kek

>>17854876 (OP)
Christianity is beautifully past this dichotomy. Everyone is equally the image of God but not equally deified. There is neither Jew nor Greek because these things are pretty much accidental. But there are saints. And if you have true love, you will see a future saint in everyone.

>>17855158
>these things are pretty much accidental
Exactly my point

>>17854889
The Catholic Church literally kept European pagans as slaves you stupid wignat.

>>17855174

>keeping demon worshippers as slaves

Based.

>>17855162
Your point is Christianity focuses on substance instead of accidents?

>>17855149 >>17855174
I'll take that to mean you will not be substantiating any of your claims.

>>17855188
What nation you're a part of is substance, not accident. We don't randomly get attributes and then get thrown into a nation. These things are all connected.

>>17855197
But you do. You get born into some nation pretty much by chance and then you are called to enter the nation that God has created, that is defined by the covenant and not by how much they season their food and how they sing their songs.

>>17855206
Take a step back and realize what you're saying and what I'm saying here.

>>17855221
I'm telling you your birth-nation is accidental and your choice of the Church as your new nation is substance. You seem to disagree. Is that fair?

>>17855227
Yes. I think your birth nation is as accidental as literally everything else that constitutes a person. If you're to tell me that being a White American (aka just an American) is accidental then my appearance, temperament, intelligence, family, and everything else about me is also accidental. And after that's gone what even remains?

>>17855239
You nature as an image of God remains. Your free choice with which you can free your nature remains. And these choices will give birth to you as a true Person in the theological sense. Second birth, a spiritual and intetional one instead of a passive fleshly one.
I understand that it's difficult to conceptualize individuality without their usual markers, such as race, character, hobbies, social connectionns, history and so on, but those are manifestations of individuality, not their carriers. After you're born again you will be more individual than these random circumstances allow you to be.

>>17855249
This is why I say Christianity is leftist.

>>17855256
Leftists choose which nation they will eternally belong to?

>>17855268
In a sense, yes. You have to understand that leftist eschatology is materialistic. It includes the destruction of all nations, of hierarchy, and of natural identity. I don't understand how Christianity is any different, it's only that the eschatology is not materialist/scientific.

>>17855274
In a way. Leftism focuses on horizontal expansion - inclusion of all, usually by fading out lines and limits.Rightism focuses on vertical expansion - hierarchy, usually by ranking consistency. Whether this is applied to nations or to sexuality or to IQ is, funnily enough, also completely accidental. They are two approaches that keep struggling for balance no matter what. Neither is inherently interested in stasis or preservation of whatever the current situation is. That's just conservatism which in the West happens to align with the right for the moment.

In other words, Christianity is neither left nor right. It is just not interested in temporary things.

>>17855300
How is Christianity not focused on inclusion of all?

>>17855306
It is. Just like it is focused on hierarchy. It strikes a balance by perfectly incorporating both approaches.

>>17855310
>focused on hierarchy
How? Christians always paint heaven as a place without hierarchy, without race, without difference. Sounds like hell to me.

>>17855314
The New Testament definitely implies heavenly hierarchy in many places:
>Matthew 5:19: "Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
>Luke 19:17, 19: The faithful servants are rewarded with differing authority: "You shall have authority over ten cities... over five cities."
>1st Corinthians 3:14–15: If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If anyone’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.

And from the Hebrew cosmology and Christian angeology it seems the heavenly hierarchy is pretty steep. But inclusive.

>>17855319
Well I still can't say I agree that the dissolution of nations is ideal.

>>17855321
It might not be ideal right now. Which is why for the time being for example the Eastern Orthodox Church is one but nations handle things autonomously. In theory. But in the future why should nations be remembered any more than what dialect people spoke?

>>17855326
>But in the future why should nations be remembered any more than what dialect people spoke?
Well I don't think the particulars of nations matter that much, but I am a believer in race. I think if you look at the world it's very clear that race has a real impact on the way society turns out, and I happen to be particular to the results that the European race produces. I think they're just better. Obviously nations shift and change over time slightly, but race doesn't. That's why I like America so much.

Sweet! Enjoy Hell.

>>17856276
Enjoy Mexico.

>>17856317
Sorry, I’m never going.

>>17856329
You've already been deported Paco.

>>17856333
>deported
Weird, I’m not in Europe Sanjay.