Did they?

>>17856228 (OP)
being fat was a sign of wealth and power back when food was not plentiful

now that food is plentiful and cheap, being fat is disgusting

I would still smash.

>>17856237
Of course you would, you are a disgusting incel.

>>17856228 (OP)
No, because the ice age is a myth.

based on my admittedly limited research i've come to the copnclusion that most ice age women looked like Stella from Hearts2Hearts.
she's from Canada, so ice. makes sense.

>>17856315
Is this real?

>>17856228 (OP)
They still do
Uwucaptain

>>17856275
>she's from Canada
Ywnbarc chang

>>17856228 (OP)
>Did they?

Maybe.
There's a condition that makes women look like that called "Steatopygia"; it causes a woman's ass to stick out so much it looks like a shelf, and is associated with gigantomastia (hyper breasts), and a more flush/thicker labia and an overall increase in penis size (longer and thicker) in men.
This gene is still commonly present in southern african populations, and some south east asian populations, but isn't otherwise as present as it "may have been" during Mesolithic caveman times when those figures were being carved. They may also be depicting "fat farming": where a girl is fed large quantities of starch and milk in order to become morbidly obese for marriage - a tradition still practiced in those aformentioned areas as well.

>>17856415
>Maybe.
No, sorry, I have to take that away from you. The earth is approximately 6,259 years old. The ice age never happened.

What are the chances this is essentially Gaia, big old BIG old mother Earth Goddess. Who's with me?

TITANIC breasts

>>17856419
0%.

>>17856433
Not even Gaia being connected to whoever this was supposed to represent?

>>17856415
>This gene is still commonly present in southern african populations, and some south east asian populations
wut? where are all the big dicked seamonkeys then?

>>17856573
>wut? where are all the big dicked seamonkeys then?

According to Prof. Wikipedia and Associate Prof. Google: the gene is only 'still' commonly present in Western Malayo-Polynesian populations, and even then specifically the Andamanese people. Austronesian people are 'supposed' to have it though, even if it's not expressed.

Of course they did. They fed the stacies mastadon, gigabear and megaboar blubber. Cro Magnon Men had 10 inch dark abo bbcs. How else do you think the white race was conceived

>>17856585
Abos have small dicks

>>17856228 (OP)
Uh just go to an inner city and you can find tons of fat black women with bodies that don't make any sense.
The genetics are all there. It's just a matter of getting enough calories, which isn't hard if they're a member of the tribal leader's group.

>>17856251
The Ice Age didn't happen but we'll make it happen

>>17856228 (OP)

>demon worship idols

Gay.

>>17856357
yes

>>17856419
>>17856423
Way too big & juicy?

>>17856228 (OP)
You literally can't divine the existence of backboobs without a living example

>>17856419
My guess is that they were a sort of grotesque figure meant to protect their carriers by scaring off foul spirits.

>>17856228 (OP)
They still do

>>17857981
I think she's beautiful. I think you need to check yourself, white incel devil. I also think something like this is very likely true, she was used for fertility magic/to ward off childbirth deaths. Better to be chunky than twiggy, Gravettian men at least were apparently pretty twiggy. But also, I'm seeing a mother goddess. Hop and a skip collective unconsciously to Mother Earth, weather magic, maybe they thought mammoths and the like emerged from the earth. Highly doubt it but maybe.

>>17856357
It's not AI but it's clearly a modern clay/playdough sculpture , it's not even hard yet

>>17858101
>it's not even hard yet
You clever little bastard

>>17856228 (OP)
What we are seeing in these sculptures are women that are morbidly obese. Were lifespans long enough that obesity would really factor into causes of death or lead to an overall shorter life span? Probably not. This build however is not at all realistic for the average hunter gatherer of the stone age, they would always have been walking/running and would not have had the division of labor or the domesticated cereal/livestock production requisite to achieve such size even if they were sedentary. We can guess that these artistic figurines likely came from semi-permanent or permanent technocomplexes, given the evident skill required relative to simple knapping. In these areas there were likely also proto-urban environments of people responsible for the facilitation and logistics of stone tool making, this would also have either created an indigenous religion or had a religion which piggybacked upon extant traditions. It is entirely possible that women who attained a great width were, not necessarily revered, but viewed as objects of some power in these sites of tool industry and maybe more broadly. We get hints about the nature of these women by the obfuscation of their face, they represent almost a primordial fear in that sense, something which I am sure all of you can pull from.

Literally me.

>>17856315
Pretty decent cock.

>>17856228 (OP)
Yes. It's likely these were self portraits.